Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Grzesik 2019 minimum number edges that occur odd
conjecture_1_1: Records the paper's statement of the Erdős--Faudree--Rousseau conjecture that graphs with one edge above the Mantel threshold have at least 2n^2/9 - O(n) edges in copies of each odd cycle of length at least five.
construction_2: Records the four-part construction with asymptotically fewer than two ninths of n squared edges lying in pentagons, above the Mantel threshold.
theorem_1_3: Gives the asymptotically sharp pentagonal-edge lower bound from a single edge above the Mantel threshold.
theorem_1_4: For each fixed k at least 3, a graph with one edge above the Mantel threshold has at least 2n^2/9 - O(n) edges lying in copies of C_{2k+1}.
theorem_1_5: Gives the sharp large-order lower bound for edges in each fixed odd cycle of length at least seven, a result that does not apply to pentagons.
theorem_1_6: A graph with about n^2/4 edges and about ((2+sqrt 2)/16)n^2 edges in pentagons is within a small fraction of n^2 edge changes of the Füredi--Maleki construction.
theorem_1_7: For fixed k at least 3, a graph with about n^2/4 edges and about 2n^2/9 edges in copies of C_{2k+1} is within a small fraction of n^2 edge changes of Construction 1.
theorem_6_1: At sufficiently large orders, every graph above the Mantel threshold with the least possible number of pentagonal edges has the four-part pattern of Construction 2 with part sizes solving an integer quadratic program.
theorem_7_1: For each fixed k at least 3 and sufficiently large n, determines the extremal graphs and the exact least number of edges in copies of C_{2k+1} among n-vertex graphs with one edge above the Mantel threshold.
Andrzej Grzesik, Ping Hu and Jan Volec, Minimum number of edges that occur in odd cycles, Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B 137 (2019), 65--103. DOI: 10.1016/j.jctb.2018.12.003.
The copy read for this card is the 34-page arXiv:1605.09055v3 manuscript dated 12 August 2018, not the journal typesetting. Printed and PDF page numbers agree. The arXiv record and Ping Hu's publication list were checked; the published text was not compared with this manuscript. The arXiv record names arXiv's non-exclusive distribution license (arXiv:1605.09055), every other right reserved.
For graphs with exactly edges, Theorem 1.3 gives at least edges in pentagons; passing to a spanning subgraph carries the bound to graphs with more edges. The Füredi--Maleki Construction 2, described in this paper on pp. 2--3, supplies the matching upper example with pentagonal edges at the threshold. This construction disproves the proposed pentagon bound , including its asymptotic version. The lower bound by itself is not a disproof.
For each fixed and sufficiently large , Theorem 1.5 and its Section 7 sharpness result give the exact minimum number of edges in copies of among -vertex graphs with exactly edges:
This confirms the asymptotic lower bound of source Conjecture 1.1 for each fixed , which the paper also states separately as Theorem 1.4. The exact inequality is a different assertion and fails at sufficiently large orders in some residue classes: Theorem 7.1 on p. 26 gives when , and when . These longer-cycle results do not apply to . The source's illustrative Construction 1 on p. 2 joins a clique on vertices to a balanced complete bipartite graph on vertices, sharing one vertex. The clique order uses a floor. The pentagon counterexample and the longer-cycle theorem concern different fixed cycle lengths.
Theorem 1.6 and Theorem 1.7 give stability, and Theorem 6.1 and Theorem 7.1 describe sufficiently large extremizers. The pentagon finite-order answer is retained as an integer quadratic optimization on p. 20, with rounding dependence; there is no single asserted all-order closed formula for pentagons here. The paper combines flag algebras, finite forcibility ideas and stability to retain the single extra edge above the Mantel threshold.
Reading and proof scope. Complete rendered manuscript pp. 1--4, 8, 19--20, 25--26, 30--31 and 34 were inspected for source identity, constructions, statements, definitions, rounding qualifications, references and certificate-checking instructions. Proposition 3.2's algebraic statement is on p. 8; Appendix A on p. 34 describes the certificate-checking procedure for Propositions 3.2 and 4.2. Section 3's opening and final assembly were located through text extraction. The result pages are statement extractions and a construction explanation, with proof pointers. They are not complete proof reconstructions or independent whole-proof reviews. The uninspected Füredi--Maleki manuscript is cited as reference [18], in preparation, on p. 31; its results are reported through this paper.
Appendix A directs readers to the authors' supplementary page for the certificate verification associated with Propositions 3.2 and 4.2. Viewed on 2026-09-09, the site instead labels its matrices and Sage scripts as supporting Claims A.1 and B.1. Those labels have not been reconciled with the v3 manuscript's numbering. The linked archive and scripts were not acquired, inspected or replayed, and no Lean verification was performed.
Source: arXiv:1605.09055v3.
Bears on. #608, which asks whether every -vertex graph with more than edges has at least edges in pentagons: Construction 2 gives, at every large order, graphs with edges and only pentagonal edges, fewer than ; Theorem 1.3 is the matching lower bound, and Theorem 1.6 and Theorem 6.1 describe the near-extremal and extremal graphs. Conjecture 1.1 at is the problem's form. Theorems 1.4, 1.5, 1.7 and 7.1 concern with only and are contrast, not a statement about pentagons.
No file of this source is held: no license on record permits its redistribution, and the card cites the edition it names above.