Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Statement

Theorem 2 (p. 76). "Let GG be a connected triangle-free graph with nn vertices, and with minimum degree δ≥2\delta\ge2. Then

(i)diam⁡G≤4⌈n−δ−12δ⌉.(ii)rad⁡G≤n−2δ+12.\text{(i)}\quad \operatorname{diam}G\le4\Bigl\lceil\frac{n-\delta-1}{2\delta}\Bigr\rceil. \qquad \text{(ii)}\quad \operatorname{rad}G\le\frac{n-2}{\delta}+12.

Furthermore, (i) and (ii) are tight apart from the exact value of the additive constant, and for every δ≥2\delta\ge2 equality can hold in (i) for infinitely many values of nn."

Asymptotically (i) reads diam⁡G≤2n/δ+O(1)\operatorname{diam}G\le2n/\delta+O(1), which is the bound of part (ii) of the paper's Conjecture at r=1r=1 (there (3r−1)/r=2(3r-1)/r=2), a case the Conjecture as printed excludes by requiring r>1r>1.

Source. J. Combin. Theory Ser. B 47 (1989), 73--79; Theorem 2 on printed p. 76 (PDF p. 4 of the offprint scan), read on the page image. The edition is identified in the source digest.

Read depth. Claims checked: the statement was read clause by clause on the page image. The proof (pp. 76--77) was read for structure only.

Proof pointer

For a diametral pair x,yx,y at distance dd put Si={v:dG(x,v)=i}S_i=\{v:d_G(x,v)=i\}. Either SiS_i spans no edge and ∣Si−1∣+∣Si+1∣≥δ|S_{i-1}|+|S_{i+1}|\ge\delta, or SiS_i contains an edge vv′vv' whose neighborhoods are disjoint by triangle-freeness, so ∣Si−1∣+∣Si∣+∣Si+1∣≥2δ|S_{i-1}|+|S_i|+|S_{i+1}|\ge2\delta; hence ∣Si−1∣+∣Si∣+∣Si+1∣+∣Si+2∣≥2δ|S_{i-1}|+|S_i|+|S_{i+1}|+|S_{i+2}|\ge2\delta for every ii (display (5), p. 76), and summing over blocks of four layers gives (i). The radius bound follows the proof of Theorem 1(ii) with a modified relation (p. 77).

Dependencies

None outside the paper.

Bears on

  • Problem 612: part (i) gives diam⁡G≤2n/δ+O(1)\operatorname{diam}G\le2n/\delta+O(1) for connected triangle-free graphs with δ≥2\delta\ge2, which is part (ii) of the problem at r=1r=1 (the case the site records as 2r+1=32r+1=3); the printed Conjecture requires r>1r>1 and so excludes this case.