Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Statement
Definitions (printed p. 223): a graph has vertices and edges; its diameter is the maximum distance between two vertices, infinite when some pair is not connected; "A graph is said to be diameter -critical or simply -critical if for every ." Square brackets are the integer part, as in .
Conjecture 1 (printed p. 223, heading as printed). "Conjecture 1 (Simon and Murty). If is a 2-critical graph, then
with equality holding if and only if ."
The paper introduces it with "The complete graph is the only 1-critical graph. For , a natural problem which arises is that of determining the number of edges in a -critical graph. For 2-critical graphs we have the following conjectures" (p. 223), and follows it with Conjecture 2 (p. 224), for the average edge degree defined by ; p. 226 states that Conjecture 2 implies and "it is not difficult to show that Conjecture 2 implies Conjecture 1". The attribution: the heading names Simon and Murty, the reference list (p. 229) has "[2] U.S.R. Murty, Private communication", and the acknowledgement thanks Murty "for bringing the problem to our attention". Plesník is not named in the paper.
In the problem's notation. Problem 742 asks whether a graph on vertices of diameter in which deleting any edge increases the diameter has at most edges. That is the inequality of Conjecture 1 with ; the equality clause, that is the only extremal graph, is asked by the paper and by Füredi's Conjecture 1.1, not by the site's wording.
Source. L. Caccetta and R. Häggkvist, On diameter critical graphs, Discrete Math. 28 (1979), 223--229, doi:10.1016/0012-365X(79)90129-8; printed p. 223 = PDF p. 1 and p. 224 = PDF p. 2 of the publisher scan, read on the page images (the OCR text layer garbles the displays). The artifact is identified in the source digest.
Read depth. Claims checked: the definitions, the introductory sentences, Conjecture 1 and Conjecture 2 were read clause by clause on the page images, and the sentence on p. 226 relating the two conjectures on the page image as well. A conjecture; the paper proves only the bounds of its Theorems 1 and 2 toward it.
Proof pointer
None in the paper. The paper's own progress is Theorem 1 (p. 228), . The conjecture was later proved for all , with a tower of 2's of height about 1000, by Füredi's Theorem 1.2 (1992), whose Conjecture 1.1 is this statement cited to "Simon and Murty (see in [CH])"; the finite remainder is recorded on the problem page.
Dependencies
None; Murty's private communication (reference [2]) is the stated origin.
Bears on
- Problem 742: the problem's statement as first printed, with the equality clause and the attribution to Simon and Murty; the site's commentary points to this paper with "(see [CaHa79])", and Erdős's 1981 reference [67] cites it as the printed home of Murty's unpublished conjecture.