Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Bujtas 2025 covering edges graph triangles

../

corollary_8: As n tends to infinity, the maximum over graphs G on n vertices of alpha_1(G) + alpha_1 of the complement of G is (1/4 + o(1)) n^2, the upper bound from Theorem 7 and the lower bound from the balanced complete bipartite graph.

proposition_11: For every graph G on n vertices, rho(G) + rho of the complement of G is at least n(n-1)/6, and the bound is asymptotically tight as n tends to infinity, the complete graphs attaining it up to O(n).

proposition_3: For every real epsilon > 0 and arbitrarily large beta > 0 there are infinitely many graphs with rho(G) > beta alpha_1(G) + (1/2 - epsilon) e(G), so no bound for the edge-and-triangle cover number of the form beta alpha_1 + c e with c < 1/2 holds.

proposition_9: For every graph G of order n, alpha_1(G) + alpha_1 of the complement of G is at least the floor of n/2, and the complete graph K_n attains this bound for every n.

theorem_10: A Nordhaus-Gaddum-type result for the edge-and-triangle cover number: as n tends to infinity, the maximum over graphs G on n vertices of rho(G) + rho of the complement of G is (1/3 + o(1)) n^2; the upper bound uses the n^2/12 + o(n^2) packing of edge-disjoint monochromatic triangles that answers Problem 76.

theorem_2: The paper's Theorem 2 restates, with attribution to Norin and Sun, that alpha_1(G) + tau_B(G) is at most |V(G)|^2/4 for every graph G, after posing the Erdős-Gallai-Tuza inequality for alpha_1 + tau_1 as its Conjecture 1; the theorem is not the paper's own.

theorem_4: The paper's main bound: for every graph G the least number of edges and triangles covering E(G) is at most the floor of (e(G) + alpha_1(G) - nu(G))/2, with equality for triangular connected graphs of every order at least 6 and non-triangular connected graphs of every order at least 1.

theorem_6: For an n-vertex graph with no isolated vertex in which no vertex neighborhood induces a component that is a complete graph of odd order, the least number of edges and triangles covering E(G) is at most the floor of (e(G) + alpha_1(G))/2 - n/6.

theorem_7: A Nordhaus-Gaddum-type upper bound: there is a constant C > 0 such that for every graph G on n vertices, alpha_1(G) + alpha_1 of the complement of G is at most n^2/4 + C n^2/ln n.


Cs. Bujtás, A. Davoodi, L. Ding, E. Győri, Zs. Tuza and D. Yang, Covering the edges of a graph with triangles, Discrete Math. 348 (2025), no. 1, Paper No. 114226, 8 pp.; DOI 10.1016/j.disc.2024.114226; received 19 October 2023, revised 9 August 2024, accepted 17 August 2024.

The copy read for this card is the publisher's PDF (Elsevier; head "Discrete Mathematics 348 (2025) 114226"), 8 pp. with article and PDF pages agreeing and a text layer, in which the statements below were read; 290,280 bytes. Provenance: the copy came from a survey download of September 2026; the download URL was not recorded. That PDF prints "© 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)." at the foot of its first page, the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 license.

Read status: claims checked for every result listed under Results below, each statement read clause by clause on the printed page, including Theorem 2 (p. 2), the quotation of the Norin--Sun inequality that the citing page consumes. The proofs (pp. 2--7) were read but not checked step by step.

Contents

  • Invariants (pp. 1--2): ρ(G)\rho(G), the least size of a set of edges and triangles covering E(G)E(G); τi(G)\tau_i(G), the least size of an edge set meeting every triangle in at least ii edges; αi(G)\alpha_i(G), the largest size of an edge set containing at most ii edges of every triangle (α1\alpha_1 is the triangle-independence number); ν(G)\nu(G), the largest number of edge-disjoint triangles. The print writes ρ△(G)\rho_\triangle(G) and ν△(G)\nu_\triangle(G) for ρ(G)\rho(G) and ν(G)\nu(G), and i∈{1,2}i\in\{1,2\}. Always αi+τ3−i=∣E(G)∣\alpha_i+\tau_{3-i}=|E(G)|.
  • Conjecture 1 (p. 2; Erdős, Gallai and Tuza [8]): α1(G)+τ1(G)≤∣V(G)∣2/4\alpha_1(G)+\tau_1(G)\le|V(G)|^2/4 for every triangular graph (every edge in a triangle); the remark notes that the version for arbitrary graphs is equivalent.
  • Theorem 2 (p. 2; Norin and Sun [12], quoted): for every graph GG, α1(G)+τB(G)≤∣V(G)∣2/4\alpha_1(G)+\tau_B(G)\le|V(G)|^2/4, where τB(G)\tau_B(G) is the least number of edges whose deletion leaves a bipartite graph; since τ1≤τB\tau_1\le\tau_B this confirms Conjecture 1. The paper notes that [12] also characterized the equality cases, that the inequality was conjectured by Lehel (for which it cites [6], a 1990 problem paper of Erdős) and, independently, decades later by Puleo [13] (footnote 6), and cites [12] as arXiv:1602.04370v1 (2016).
  • Lehel and Tuza [10] (p. 2): α1(G)≤ρ(G)≤α2(G)=e(G)−τ1(G)\alpha_1(G)\le\rho(G)\le\alpha_2(G)=e(G)-\tau_1(G).
  • The paper's main bound (2) (p. 2; Theorem 4, p. 3, proved in Section 2): ρ(G)≤⌊12(e(G)+α1(G)−ν(G))⌋\rho(G)\le\bigl\lfloor\tfrac12(e(G)+\alpha_1(G)-\nu(G))\bigr\rfloor, attained for some graph of every order n≥1n\ge1; Proposition 3 (p. 2) shows that the coefficient 12\tfrac12 of e(G)e(G) cannot be lowered even at the cost of an arbitrarily large multiple of α1(G)\alpha_1(G).
  • Theorem 6 (p. 4): for nn-vertex graphs with no isolated vertex in which no vertex neighborhood induces a component that is a complete graph of odd order, ρ(G)≤⌊12(e(G)+α1(G))−n/6⌋\rho(G)\le\lfloor\tfrac12(e(G)+\alpha_1(G))-n/6\rfloor; its proof uses Lemma 5 (p. 4) on maximum matchings.
  • Section 3 (pp. 5--7), Nordhaus--Gaddum-type results, with G‾\overline G the complement: α1(G)+α1(G‾)≤n2/4+Cn2/ln⁡n\alpha_1(G)+\alpha_1(\overline G)\le n^2/4+Cn^2/\ln n (Theorem 7, p. 5), the maximum of this sum is (14+o(1))n2(\tfrac14+o(1))n^2 (Corollary 8, p. 7) and the sum is at least ⌊n/2⌋\lfloor n/2\rfloor, tightly (Proposition 9, p. 7); the maximum of ρ(G)+ρ(G‾)\rho(G)+\rho(\overline G) is (13+o(1))n2(\tfrac13+o(1))n^2 (Theorem 10, p. 7), and the sum is at least n(n−1)/6n(n-1)/6, asymptotically tightly (Proposition 11, p. 7).

Compiled scope

All eight pages were read on the page images: every statement listed above clause by clause, and the proofs without step-by-step checking. Nothing here is independently reviewed.

Bears on. #621, which cites the paper in its Progress section as published uptake of the Norin--Sun inequality: Theorem 2 (p. 2) states that inequality and cites the arXiv v1 that the page selects; the paper's own results concern ρ(G)\rho(G) and α1\alpha_1 and are not used there. #76: the upper bound of Theorem 10 (p. 7) uses, as an input, the statement that every 2-coloring of the edges of KnK_n has at least 112n2+o(n2)\tfrac1{12}n^2+o(n^2) edge-disjoint monochromatic triangles, which the paper calls a conjecture of Erdős, Faudree and Ordman confirmed by its reference [9] (Gruslys and Letzter, arXiv:2008.05311; the text names them "Gruslys and Shoham"); the paper adds nothing toward that problem.

Results. Theorem 2 (p. 2, quoted from Norin and Sun, with Conjecture 1); Proposition 3 (p. 2); Theorem 4 (p. 3); Theorem 6 (p. 4); Theorem 7 (p. 5); Corollary 8 (p. 7); Proposition 9 (p. 7); Theorem 10 (p. 7); Proposition 11 (p. 7). Lemma 5 (p. 4) is a proof step of Theorem 6, summarized on its page.

No file of this source is held: no license on record permits its redistribution, and the card cites the edition it names above.