Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Bujtas 2025 covering edges graph triangles
corollary_8: As n tends to infinity, the maximum over graphs G on n vertices of alpha_1(G) + alpha_1 of the complement of G is (1/4 + o(1)) n^2, the upper bound from Theorem 7 and the lower bound from the balanced complete bipartite graph.
proposition_11: For every graph G on n vertices, rho(G) + rho of the complement of G is at least n(n-1)/6, and the bound is asymptotically tight as n tends to infinity, the complete graphs attaining it up to O(n).
proposition_3: For every real epsilon > 0 and arbitrarily large beta > 0 there are infinitely many graphs with rho(G) > beta alpha_1(G) + (1/2 - epsilon) e(G), so no bound for the edge-and-triangle cover number of the form beta alpha_1 + c e with c < 1/2 holds.
proposition_9: For every graph G of order n, alpha_1(G) + alpha_1 of the complement of G is at least the floor of n/2, and the complete graph K_n attains this bound for every n.
theorem_10: A Nordhaus-Gaddum-type result for the edge-and-triangle cover number: as n tends to infinity, the maximum over graphs G on n vertices of rho(G) + rho of the complement of G is (1/3 + o(1)) n^2; the upper bound uses the n^2/12 + o(n^2) packing of edge-disjoint monochromatic triangles that answers Problem 76.
theorem_2: The paper's Theorem 2 restates, with attribution to Norin and Sun, that alpha_1(G) + tau_B(G) is at most |V(G)|^2/4 for every graph G, after posing the Erdős-Gallai-Tuza inequality for alpha_1 + tau_1 as its Conjecture 1; the theorem is not the paper's own.
theorem_4: The paper's main bound: for every graph G the least number of edges and triangles covering E(G) is at most the floor of (e(G) + alpha_1(G) - nu(G))/2, with equality for triangular connected graphs of every order at least 6 and non-triangular connected graphs of every order at least 1.
theorem_6: For an n-vertex graph with no isolated vertex in which no vertex neighborhood induces a component that is a complete graph of odd order, the least number of edges and triangles covering E(G) is at most the floor of (e(G) + alpha_1(G))/2 - n/6.
theorem_7: A Nordhaus-Gaddum-type upper bound: there is a constant C > 0 such that for every graph G on n vertices, alpha_1(G) + alpha_1 of the complement of G is at most n^2/4 + C n^2/ln n.
Cs. Bujtás, A. Davoodi, L. Ding, E. Győri, Zs. Tuza and D. Yang, Covering the edges of a graph with triangles, Discrete Math. 348 (2025), no. 1, Paper No. 114226, 8 pp.; DOI 10.1016/j.disc.2024.114226; received 19 October 2023, revised 9 August 2024, accepted 17 August 2024.
The copy read for this card is the publisher's PDF (Elsevier; head "Discrete Mathematics 348 (2025) 114226"), 8 pp. with article and PDF pages agreeing and a text layer, in which the statements below were read; 290,280 bytes. Provenance: the copy came from a survey download of September 2026; the download URL was not recorded. That PDF prints "© 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)." at the foot of its first page, the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 license.
Read status: claims checked for every result listed under Results below, each statement read clause by clause on the printed page, including Theorem 2 (p. 2), the quotation of the Norin--Sun inequality that the citing page consumes. The proofs (pp. 2--7) were read but not checked step by step.
Contents
- Invariants (pp. 1--2): , the least size of a set of edges and triangles covering ; , the least size of an edge set meeting every triangle in at least edges; , the largest size of an edge set containing at most edges of every triangle ( is the triangle-independence number); , the largest number of edge-disjoint triangles. The print writes and for and , and . Always .
- Conjecture 1 (p. 2; Erdős, Gallai and Tuza [8]): for every triangular graph (every edge in a triangle); the remark notes that the version for arbitrary graphs is equivalent.
- Theorem 2 (p. 2; Norin and Sun [12], quoted): for every graph , , where is the least number of edges whose deletion leaves a bipartite graph; since this confirms Conjecture 1. The paper notes that [12] also characterized the equality cases, that the inequality was conjectured by Lehel (for which it cites [6], a 1990 problem paper of Erdős) and, independently, decades later by Puleo [13] (footnote 6), and cites [12] as arXiv:1602.04370v1 (2016).
- Lehel and Tuza [10] (p. 2): .
- The paper's main bound (2) (p. 2; Theorem 4, p. 3, proved in Section 2): , attained for some graph of every order ; Proposition 3 (p. 2) shows that the coefficient of cannot be lowered even at the cost of an arbitrarily large multiple of .
- Theorem 6 (p. 4): for -vertex graphs with no isolated vertex in which no vertex neighborhood induces a component that is a complete graph of odd order, ; its proof uses Lemma 5 (p. 4) on maximum matchings.
- Section 3 (pp. 5--7), Nordhaus--Gaddum-type results, with the complement: (Theorem 7, p. 5), the maximum of this sum is (Corollary 8, p. 7) and the sum is at least , tightly (Proposition 9, p. 7); the maximum of is (Theorem 10, p. 7), and the sum is at least , asymptotically tightly (Proposition 11, p. 7).
Compiled scope
All eight pages were read on the page images: every statement listed above clause by clause, and the proofs without step-by-step checking. Nothing here is independently reviewed.
Bears on. #621, which cites the paper in its Progress section as published uptake of the Norin--Sun inequality: Theorem 2 (p. 2) states that inequality and cites the arXiv v1 that the page selects; the paper's own results concern and and are not used there. #76: the upper bound of Theorem 10 (p. 7) uses, as an input, the statement that every 2-coloring of the edges of has at least edge-disjoint monochromatic triangles, which the paper calls a conjecture of Erdős, Faudree and Ordman confirmed by its reference [9] (Gruslys and Letzter, arXiv:2008.05311; the text names them "Gruslys and Shoham"); the paper adds nothing toward that problem.
Results. Theorem 2 (p. 2, quoted from Norin and Sun, with Conjecture 1); Proposition 3 (p. 2); Theorem 4 (p. 3); Theorem 6 (p. 4); Theorem 7 (p. 5); Corollary 8 (p. 7); Proposition 9 (p. 7); Theorem 10 (p. 7); Proposition 11 (p. 7). Lemma 5 (p. 4) is a proof step of Theorem 6, summarized on its page.
No file of this source is held: no license on record permits its redistribution, and the card cites the edition it names above.