Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Statement

As printed on p. 8 of the preprint (arXiv:math/0410218v1; page image): "Theorem 3 For every ε>0\varepsilon>0 there exist n0=n0(ε)n_0=n_0(\varepsilon) and δ=δ(ε)>0\delta=\delta(\varepsilon)>0 such that if m>tr(n)−δn2m>t_r(n)-\delta n^2 then

Δr(n,m)>(1−ε)2rmn\Delta_r(n,m)>(1-\varepsilon)\frac{2rm}n

for all n>n0n>n_0."

Here Δr(n,m)\Delta_r(n,m) is the minimum over all graphs with nn vertices and mm edges of the largest degree sum of an rr-clique (p. 2), and r≥2r\ge2 is fixed. The section's opening sentence (p. 7) sets the context: "It is known that inequality (2) is far from being true if m≤tr(n)−εnm\le t_r(n)-\varepsilon n for some ε>0\varepsilon>0 (e.g., see [7]). However, it turns out that, as mm approaches tr(n)t_r(n), the function Δr(n,m)\Delta_r(n,m) approaches 2rm/n2rm/n", where (2) is Δr(n,m)≥2rm/n\Delta_r(n,m)\ge2rm/n and [7] is Faudree 1992. The abstract states the theorem with "≥(1−ε)2rm/n\ge(1-\varepsilon)2rm/n"; the theorem itself prints a strict inequality. The introduction (p. 2) attests the complementary upper bound, "An explicit construction due to Erdős (see [7]) shows that, for every ε>0\varepsilon>0, there exists δ>0\delta>0 such that if tr−1(n)<m<tr(n)−δn2t_{r-1}(n)<m<t_r(n)-\delta n^2 then Δr(n,m)≤(1−ε)2rm/n\Delta_r(n,m)\le(1-\varepsilon)2rm/n", which is not a theorem of this paper and is recorded second-hand.

Source. B. Bollobás and V. Nikiforov, The sum of degrees in cliques, Electron. J. Combin. 12 (2005), N21; p. 8 of arXiv v1, with the opening of Section 4 on p. 7 and the introduction on p. 2, read on the rendered page images and in the text layer. The edition read is identified in the source digest.

Read depth. Claims checked: the theorem, the opening of Section 4 and the introduction's sentences were read clause by clause on the page images; the proof (pp. 8--9) was read for its structure and not checked.

Proof pointer

Pp. 8--9. Assume 0<ε<2/(r(r+1))0<\varepsilon<2/(r(r+1)) and set δ=ε2/32\delta=\varepsilon^2/32. For m≥tr(n)m\ge t_r(n) the claim is Theorem 2; else 2rm/n≤(r−1)n2rm/n\le(r-1)n and it suffices to show Δr(n,m)>(1−ε)(r−1)n\Delta_r(n,m)>(1-\varepsilon)(r-1)n (display (17)). Let MεM_\varepsilon be the vertices of degree at most (r−1r−ε2)n(\frac{r-1}r-\frac\varepsilon2)n. Part (a): if ∣Mε∣≥εn|M_\varepsilon|\ge\varepsilon n, remove a subset M′M' of size about 12εn\frac12\varepsilon n (display (19)) and count edges (display (20)); either the remaining graph is dense enough for Theorem 2 to give (17), or the count contradicts the choice of M′M' through the inequality x2−εx+4δ>0x^2-\varepsilon x+4\delta>0. Part (b): the graph induced on V∖MεV\setminus M_\varepsilon has minimum degree above r−2r−1(n−∣Mε∣)\frac{r-2}{r-1}(n-|M_\varepsilon|), so Turán's theorem gives an rr-clique whose degree sum in GG exceeds r(r−1r−ε2)n≥(1−ε)(r−1)nr(\frac{r-1}r-\frac\varepsilon2)n\ge(1-\varepsilon)(r-1)n. Not reconstructed here.

Dependencies

Theorem 2 of the paper (theorem_2), display (4) for tr(n)t_r(n), and Turán's theorem.

Bears on

  • Problem 1033: the stability bound the site's commentary quotes ("Bollobás and Nikiforov proved that, for every ϵ>0\epsilon>0, there exists δ>0\delta>0 such that if m>tr(n)−δn2m>t_r(n)-\delta n^2 then Δr(n,m)≥(1−ϵ)2rm/n\Delta_r(n,m)\ge(1-\epsilon)2rm/n"), read here with the theorem's strict inequality and the condition n>n0n>n_0; at r=3r=3 it concerns edge counts within δn2\delta n^2 of n2/3n^2/3, not the problem's regime m=⌊n2/4⌋+1m=\lfloor n^2/4\rfloor+1, where the introduction says the value is "essentially unknown".