Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

The maximum number of disjoint pairs in a family of subsets

../

conjecture_6_2: Alon and Frankl's conjecture that the largest proportion of comparable pairs in a family of 2^(n/2) n^d subsets of an n-set, c(n, 2^(n/2) n^d) divided by (2^(n/2) n^d)^2, tends to 0 as d tends to infinity.

example_6_1: Alon and Frankl's construction: for an equipartition X = X_1 u X_2, the sets meeting X_2 in at most d elements together with the sets missing at most d elements of X_1 form a family F of m sets, of order n^d 2^(n/2) for fixed d, with c(F) >= 2^(-2d-1) binom(m,2).

inequality_2_1: Alon and Frankl's explicit case k = 1: every family of m = 2^((1/2+delta)n) subsets of an n-set, delta > 0, has d(F) < m^(2-delta^2/2) disjoint pairs, and applied to the family with its complements this gives c(F) < 4m^(2-delta^2/2) comparable pairs.

theorem_1_3: Alon and Frankl's Erdős--Stone type bound: for each positive integer k there is beta(k) > 0 such that if m = 2^((1/(k+1)+delta)n) with delta > 0 then d(n,m) < (1-1/k) binom(m,2) + O(m^(2-beta delta^2)), where d(n,m) is the most disjoint pairs among m subsets of an n-set.

theorem_1_4: Alon and Frankl's Erdős--Stone type bound for containments: for each positive integer k there is beta'(k) > 0 such that if m = 2^((1/(k+1)+delta)n) with delta > 0 then c(n,m) < (1-1/k) binom(m,2) + O(m^(2-beta' delta^(k+1))), where c(n,m) is the most comparable pairs among m subsets of an n-set.

theorem_5_1: Alon and Frankl's theorem that if a family F of subsets of an n-set has m >= 2^(((r-1)/r+delta)n) members, delta > 0 and r >= 2, then the number d_r(F) of r-sets of members with empty intersection is o(binom(m,r)) as n tends to infinity with delta and r fixed.

theorem_5_2: Alon and Frankl's theorem that if a family F of subsets of an n-set has m >= 2^((1/s+delta)n) members, delta > 0 and s >= 2, then the number p_s(F) of s-sets of pairwise disjoint members is o(binom(m,s)) as n tends to infinity with delta and s fixed.

theorem_5_3: Alon and Frankl's theorem that if a family F of subsets of an n-set has m >= 2^((1/s+delta)n) members, delta > 0 and s >= 2, then the number c_s(F) of chains F_1 ⊂ F_2 ⊂ ... ⊂ F_s of members is o(binom(m,s)).


Alon, N. and Frankl, P., The maximum number of disjoint pairs in a family of subsets. Graphs Combin. 1 (1985), 13--21, doi:10.1007/BF02582924. The copy read for this card, from the author's publications page, prints "© Springer-Verlag 1985" in its first-page header ("Graphs and Combinatorics 1, 13-21 (1985)"), every other right reserved.

For a family F\mathcal F of mm subsets of {1,…,n}\{1,\ldots,n\} the paper counts the disjoint pairs d(F)d(\mathcal F) and the comparable pairs c(F)c(\mathcal F), with maxima d(n,m)d(n,m) and c(n,m)c(n,m) over families of size mm (p. 13). Examples 1.1 and 1.2 (pp. 13--14) reach (1−1k)(m2)(1-\frac1k)\binom m2 for both counts when m≤k⋅2⌊n/k⌋m\le k\cdot2^{\lfloor n/k\rfloor}, and Theorems 1.3 and 1.4 (p. 14) show that for m=2(1/(k+1)+δ)nm=2^{(1/(k+1)+\delta)n}, δ>0\delta>0, neither count exceeds (1−1k)(m2)(1-\frac1k)\binom m2 by more than O(m2−βδ2)O(m^{2-\beta\delta^2}), respectively O(m2−β′δk+1)O(m^{2-\beta'\delta^{k+1}}), with β,β′>0\beta,\beta'>0 depending on kk. The case k=1k=1 is proved directly by sampling in Section 2, as inequality (2.1) (p. 14): d(F)<m2−δ2/2d(\mathcal F)<m^{2-\delta^2/2} for m=2(1/2+δ)nm=2^{(1/2+\delta)n}, hence c(F)<4m2−δ2/2c(\mathcal F)<4m^{2-\delta^2/2}. Section 3 proves a partition lemma for set families (Lemma 3.1, p. 15) and with Turán's theorem derives d(F)≤(1−1k+o(1))(m2)d(\mathcal F)\le(1-\frac1k+o(1))\binom m2; Section 4 (pp. 17--19) proves Theorem 1.3 in full by supersaturation and sketches Theorem 1.4. Section 5 (pp. 19--20) gives o((mr))o(\binom mr) and o((ms))o(\binom ms) bounds for rr-tuples with empty intersection (Theorem 5.1), pairwise disjoint ss-tuples (Theorem 5.2) and chains of ss members (Theorem 5.3) above the thresholds 2((r−1)/r+δ)n2^{((r-1)/r+\delta)n}, 2((1/s)+δ)n2^{((1/s)+\delta)n} and 2((1/s)+δ)n2^{((1/s)+\delta)n}. Section 6 (pp. 20--21) gives Example 6.1, families of order nd2n/2n^d2^{n/2} sets with at least 2−2d−1(m2)2^{-2d-1}\binom m2 comparable pairs, which the paper says disproves a conjecture of Erdős; poses Conjecture 6.2; and remarks that its methods extend from disjoint pairs to pairs meeting in fewer than δ′n\delta'n elements, δ′<2δ\delta'<2\delta, for families of more than 2((1/2)+δ)n2^{((1/2)+\delta)n} sets.

Read status: claims checked for every result page below, read clause by clause on the print; the proofs were followed as each page's Read depth states. Nothing here is independently reviewed.

Source: https://web.math.princeton.edu/~nalon/PDFS/publications.html.

Bears on.

  • #777: the paper says the case k=1k=1 of Theorems 1.3 and 1.4 was conjectured by Daykin and Erdős in Guy's miscellany, the problem's source, and the case k=1k=1 of Theorem 1.4 bounds the comparable pairs of m=2(1/2+δ)nm=2^{(1/2+\delta)n} sets by O(m2−β′δ2)O(m^{2-\beta'\delta^2}); inequality (2.1) bounds the comparable pairs of every family of m=2(1/2+δ)nm=2^{(1/2+\delta)n} sets by 4m2−δ2/24m^{2-\delta^2/2}; and Example 6.1 gives, for each fixed d≥1d\ge1, families of order nd2n/2n^d2^{n/2} sets with at least 2−2d−1(m2)2^{-2d-1}\binom m2 comparable pairs. The problem page records that the site credits Alon and Frankl with the answers to the second question (no) and the third (yes). The paper does not state the first question.

Results.

  • Theorem 1.3 (p. 14): for m=2(1/(k+1)+δ)nm=2^{(1/(k+1)+\delta)n}, d(n,m)<(1−1k)(m2)+O(m2−βδ2)d(n,m)<(1-\frac1k)\binom m2+O(m^{2-\beta\delta^2}).
  • Theorem 1.4 (p. 14): for m=2(1/(k+1)+δ)nm=2^{(1/(k+1)+\delta)n}, c(n,m)<(1−1k)(m2)+O(m2−β′δk+1)c(n,m)<(1-\frac1k)\binom m2+O(m^{2-\beta'\delta^{k+1}}).
  • Inequality (2.1) (p. 14): for m=2(1/2+δ)nm=2^{(1/2+\delta)n}, d(F)<m2−δ2/2d(\mathcal F)<m^{2-\delta^2/2}, and hence c(F)<4m2−δ2/2c(\mathcal F)<4m^{2-\delta^2/2}.
  • Theorem 5.1 (p. 19): dr(F)=o((mr))d_r(\mathcal F)=o(\binom mr) for m≥2((r−1)/r+δ)nm\ge2^{((r-1)/r+\delta)n}.
  • Theorem 5.2 (p. 20): ps(F)=o((ms))p_s(\mathcal F)=o(\binom ms) for m≥2((1/s)+δ)nm\ge2^{((1/s)+\delta)n}.
  • Theorem 5.3 (p. 20): cs(F)=o((ms))c_s(\mathcal F)=o(\binom ms) for m≥2((1/s)+δ)nm\ge2^{((1/s)+\delta)n}.
  • Example 6.1 (pp. 20--21): families of order nd2n/2n^d2^{n/2} sets with c(F)≥2−2d−1(m2)c(\mathcal F)\ge2^{-2d-1}\binom m2.
  • Conjecture 6.2 (p. 21): c(n,2(n/2)⋅nd)/(2(n/2)⋅nd)2→0c(n,2^{(n/2)}\cdot n^d)/(2^{(n/2)}\cdot n^d)^2\to0 as d→∞d\to\infty.

No file of this source is held: no license on record permits its redistribution, and the card cites the edition it names above.