Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
The maximum number of disjoint pairs in a family of subsets
conjecture_6_2: Alon and Frankl's conjecture that the largest proportion of comparable pairs in a family of 2^(n/2) n^d subsets of an n-set, c(n, 2^(n/2) n^d) divided by (2^(n/2) n^d)^2, tends to 0 as d tends to infinity.
example_6_1: Alon and Frankl's construction: for an equipartition X = X_1 u X_2, the sets meeting X_2 in at most d elements together with the sets missing at most d elements of X_1 form a family F of m sets, of order n^d 2^(n/2) for fixed d, with c(F) >= 2^(-2d-1) binom(m,2).
inequality_2_1: Alon and Frankl's explicit case k = 1: every family of m = 2^((1/2+delta)n) subsets of an n-set, delta > 0, has d(F) < m^(2-delta^2/2) disjoint pairs, and applied to the family with its complements this gives c(F) < 4m^(2-delta^2/2) comparable pairs.
theorem_1_3: Alon and Frankl's Erdős--Stone type bound: for each positive integer k there is beta(k) > 0 such that if m = 2^((1/(k+1)+delta)n) with delta > 0 then d(n,m) < (1-1/k) binom(m,2) + O(m^(2-beta delta^2)), where d(n,m) is the most disjoint pairs among m subsets of an n-set.
theorem_1_4: Alon and Frankl's Erdős--Stone type bound for containments: for each positive integer k there is beta'(k) > 0 such that if m = 2^((1/(k+1)+delta)n) with delta > 0 then c(n,m) < (1-1/k) binom(m,2) + O(m^(2-beta' delta^(k+1))), where c(n,m) is the most comparable pairs among m subsets of an n-set.
theorem_5_1: Alon and Frankl's theorem that if a family F of subsets of an n-set has m >= 2^(((r-1)/r+delta)n) members, delta > 0 and r >= 2, then the number d_r(F) of r-sets of members with empty intersection is o(binom(m,r)) as n tends to infinity with delta and r fixed.
theorem_5_2: Alon and Frankl's theorem that if a family F of subsets of an n-set has m >= 2^((1/s+delta)n) members, delta > 0 and s >= 2, then the number p_s(F) of s-sets of pairwise disjoint members is o(binom(m,s)) as n tends to infinity with delta and s fixed.
theorem_5_3: Alon and Frankl's theorem that if a family F of subsets of an n-set has m >= 2^((1/s+delta)n) members, delta > 0 and s >= 2, then the number c_s(F) of chains F_1 ⊂ F_2 ⊂ ... ⊂ F_s of members is o(binom(m,s)).
Alon, N. and Frankl, P., The maximum number of disjoint pairs in a family of subsets. Graphs Combin. 1 (1985), 13--21, doi:10.1007/BF02582924. The copy read for this card, from the author's publications page, prints "© Springer-Verlag 1985" in its first-page header ("Graphs and Combinatorics 1, 13-21 (1985)"), every other right reserved.
For a family of subsets of the paper counts the disjoint pairs and the comparable pairs , with maxima and over families of size (p. 13). Examples 1.1 and 1.2 (pp. 13--14) reach for both counts when , and Theorems 1.3 and 1.4 (p. 14) show that for , , neither count exceeds by more than , respectively , with depending on . The case is proved directly by sampling in Section 2, as inequality (2.1) (p. 14): for , hence . Section 3 proves a partition lemma for set families (Lemma 3.1, p. 15) and with Turán's theorem derives ; Section 4 (pp. 17--19) proves Theorem 1.3 in full by supersaturation and sketches Theorem 1.4. Section 5 (pp. 19--20) gives and bounds for -tuples with empty intersection (Theorem 5.1), pairwise disjoint -tuples (Theorem 5.2) and chains of members (Theorem 5.3) above the thresholds , and . Section 6 (pp. 20--21) gives Example 6.1, families of order sets with at least comparable pairs, which the paper says disproves a conjecture of Erdős; poses Conjecture 6.2; and remarks that its methods extend from disjoint pairs to pairs meeting in fewer than elements, , for families of more than sets.
Read status: claims checked for every result page below, read clause by clause on the print; the proofs were followed as each page's Read depth states. Nothing here is independently reviewed.
Source: https://web.math.princeton.edu/~nalon/PDFS/publications.html.
Bears on.
- #777: the paper says the case of Theorems 1.3 and 1.4 was conjectured by Daykin and Erdős in Guy's miscellany, the problem's source, and the case of Theorem 1.4 bounds the comparable pairs of sets by ; inequality (2.1) bounds the comparable pairs of every family of sets by ; and Example 6.1 gives, for each fixed , families of order sets with at least comparable pairs. The problem page records that the site credits Alon and Frankl with the answers to the second question (no) and the third (yes). The paper does not state the first question.
Results.
- Theorem 1.3 (p. 14): for , .
- Theorem 1.4 (p. 14): for , .
- Inequality (2.1) (p. 14): for , , and hence .
- Theorem 5.1 (p. 19): for .
- Theorem 5.2 (p. 20): for .
- Theorem 5.3 (p. 20): for .
- Example 6.1 (pp. 20--21): families of order sets with .
- Conjecture 6.2 (p. 21): as .
No file of this source is held: no license on record permits its redistribution, and the card cites the edition it names above.