Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Statement

If a triangle TT has a tiling by congruent triangles not similar to TT, its tile count cannot be square unless either

  1. TT is isosceles, or
  2. its angles can be labeled (A,B,C)(A,B,C) with C=A/2+BC=A/2+B and 2sin⁡(A/4)=M/K∈Q2\sin(A/4)=M/K\in\mathbb Q, where M,KM,K are positive integers and 2K2−M22K^2-M^2 is a square.

This is a necessary exception list for a given non-reptiling, not a claim that every isosceles triangle has a square non-reptiling.

Source and scope. Beeson–Laczkovich–Zhang, arXiv:2604.03609v3, Theorem 3, p. 2; proof p. 21. Complete rewritten deduction from the linked same-paper results and their explicit external dependencies.

Proof

Assume TT is not isosceles. By Theorem 11 and Proposition 13, the tiling belongs to one of the six table rows. Rows 2, 3, 4, and 6 have nonsquare counts by Propositions 26, 28, 27, and 30, respectively. Row 1 is nonsquare by Proposition 31.

Thus a square count can occur only in row 5, where T=(2α,β,α+β)T=(2\alpha,\beta,\alpha+\beta) and 3α+2β=π3\alpha+2\beta=\pi. Proposition 29 identifies precisely its square criterion. In the notation A=2αA=2\alpha, B=βB=\beta, it is the second exception above.

The proof does not depend on the secondary uniqueness claim in Theorem 32.

Bears on. Problem 633.