Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Statement

Let T=(A,2A,π−3A)T=(A,2A,\pi-3A) have incommensurable angles and 3tan⁡(A/2)∈Q\sqrt3\tan(A/2)\in\mathbb Q. Put α=A\alpha=A, β=π/3−A\beta=\pi/3-A, and γ=2π/3\gamma=2\pi/3. Then TT has a tiling by R=(α,β,γ)R=(\alpha,\beta,\gamma), and every such tiling is nonsquare.

Source and scope. Beeson–Laczkovich–Zhang, arXiv:2604.03609v3, Proposition 28, p. 15. Complete rewritten proof with external existence input Laczkovich (1995), Theorem 2.5.

Proof

The positive angles of TT imply 0<A<π/30<A<\pi/3. Proposition 10 gives the rationality hypotheses 3sin⁡α,cos⁡α∈Q\sqrt3\sin\alpha,\cos\alpha\in\mathbb Q of Laczkovich's Theorem 2.5, whose relevant conclusion is that (α,2α,3β)(\alpha,2\alpha,3\beta) is tiled by congruent copies of (α,β,2π/3)(\alpha,\beta,2\pi/3). This proves existence.

Normalize tile sides to integers. Boundary sides of TT are then integers. A triangle with angles u,v,wu,v,w and side dd opposite ww has area d2sin⁡usin⁡v/(2sin⁡w)d^2\sin u\sin v/(2\sin w). Applying this to RR with w=βw=\beta and to TT with w=π−3αw=\pi-3\alpha (whose sine is sin⁡3α\sin3\alpha) shows that, for some q∈Q>0q\in\mathbb Q_{>0},

N=q2sin⁡2αsin⁡βsin⁡3αsin⁡γ=q22cos⁡α(cos⁡α−sin⁡α/3)(2cos⁡α−1)(2cos⁡α+1).N=q^2\frac{\sin2\alpha\sin\beta}{\sin3\alpha\sin\gamma} =q^2\frac{2\cos\alpha(\cos\alpha-\sin\alpha/\sqrt3)} {(2\cos\alpha-1)(2\cos\alpha+1)}.

We used sin⁡3α=sin⁡α(2cos⁡α−1)(2cos⁡α+1)\sin3\alpha=\sin\alpha(2\cos\alpha-1)(2\cos\alpha+1) and sin⁡β/sin⁡γ=cos⁡α−sin⁡α/3\sin\beta/\sin\gamma=\cos\alpha-\sin\alpha/\sqrt3. Put t=tan⁡(α/2)/3∈Qt=\tan(\alpha/2)/\sqrt3\in\mathbb Q. By Proposition 10, 0<t<1/30<t<1/3. Substituting its formulas for cosine and sine gives

N=q22(3t2−1)3(3t+1)(t−1).N=q^2\frac{2(3t^2-1)}{3(3t+1)(t-1)}.

For example the cancellation uses 1−2t−3t2=(1+t)(1−3t)1-2t-3t^2=(1+t)(1-3t) and 1−9t2=(1−3t)(1+3t)1-9t^2=(1-3t)(1+3t); these factors are nonzero in the stated interval. The remaining rational factor is not a square by Proposition 21. Since q≠0q\ne0, neither is NN.

Bears on. Problem 633.