Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Alon 2026 remarks disproof unit distance conjecture

../

class_tower_construction: Constructs growing-degree CM fields with bounded root discriminant and a fixed completely split prime, then verifies the lattice parameters.

lemma_2_1_lattice_window: Averages a product-disc window over lattice translates and projects it to the plane while tracking unordered unit-distance pairs and cardinality.

lemma_2_2_norm_one_elements: Uses ideal classes and conjugate prime ideals to construct many distinct magnitude-one elements in a controlled inverse ideal.

proposition_2_3_split_primes: Records the companion's modification of a Frobenius-cutting theorem to obtain split primes congruent to one modulo four.

theorem_1_1_e90_e92: Assembles the CM lattice construction, obtains planar sets with a fixed exponent gain, and derives the disproofs of Problems 90 and 92.


Noga Alon, Thomas F. Bloom, W. T. Gowers, Daniel Litt, Will Sawin, Arul Shankar, Jacob Tsimerman, Victor Wang, and Melanie Matchett Wood, Remarks on the disproof of the unit distance conjecture, arXiv:2605.20695v1, submitted 20 May 2026, 19 pp.

Retained version

The canonical PDF is the 19-page arXiv v1 manuscript. The theorem and page locators below refer to that version. A byte-distinct CDN export, is retained separately. It has the same 19-page title, author list, and pagination. A supplementary native-text token comparison, after removal of the arXiv watermark, found only capitalization in Daniel Litt's email address; this is not a claim that the two rendered PDFs were compared page by page. The complete mathematical reading used the arXiv v1 PDF. The arXiv record (https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.20695, read 2026-10-02) names the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license for the canonical PDF alon_2026_remarks_disproof_unit_distance_conjecture.pdf. The CDN export alon_2026_remarks_disproof_unit_distance_conjecture_cdn.pdf prints no notice and its download URL is unrecorded; its term is taken from the arXiv v1 record of the same manuscript (https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.20695v1, read 2026-10-02), which names the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license.

The source describes Theorem 1.1 as due to an internal OpenAI model and says of its own proof: "The proof we give in these remarks is a human-digested, somewhat simplified, and somewhat generalized version of the AI proof" (p. 1). That is author provenance, rather than a novelty or external-acceptance claim. The original 18-page OpenAI report is filed separately at [[discrete_geometry/openai_2026_planar_point_sets_many_unit_distances/_index|Planar Point Sets with Many Unit Distances]].

Main result

Theorem 1.1 proves that there is a fixed ε>0\varepsilon>0 and a sequence of finite sets Pi⊂R2P_i\subset\mathbb R^2, with ∣Pi∣→∞|P_i|\to\infty, such that the number of unordered pairs at Euclidean distance one in PiP_i is at least ∣Pi∣1+ε|P_i|^{1+\varepsilon}. The proof uses finite layers of a totally real pro-22 class-field tower, adjoins ii, and applies two same-paper lemmas to a scaled Minkowski lattice. A fixed rational prime that splits completely in every layer supplies exponentially many norm-one differences, while bounded root discriminant controls the lattice covolume.

The proof-bearing material is Theorem 1.1 on p. 1 and Section 2 on pp. 3--7:

  • [[discrete_geometry/alon_2026_remarks_disproof_unit_distance_conjecture/lemma_2_1_lattice_window|Lemma 2.1]] averages a product-disc window over lattice translates and keeps the factor of two that converts directed translations into unordered pairs.
  • [[discrete_geometry/alon_2026_remarks_disproof_unit_distance_conjecture/lemma_2_2_norm_one_elements|Lemma 2.2]] uses ideal classes to construct many distinct magnitude-one elements in a controlled inverse ideal.
  • [[discrete_geometry/alon_2026_remarks_disproof_unit_distance_conjecture/class_tower_construction|The class-tower construction]] records the exact external inputs, verifies the numerical tower parameters, and constructs the lattices used by the two lemmas.
  • [[discrete_geometry/alon_2026_remarks_disproof_unit_distance_conjecture/theorem_1_1_e90_e92|Theorem 1.1 and its problem transfers]] assemble the bounds, extract a fixed positive exponent despite the factor 22, project injectively to the Euclidean plane, and derive the stated consequences for Problems 90 and 92.

The optional [[discrete_geometry/alon_2026_remarks_disproof_unit_distance_conjecture/proposition_2_3_split_primes|Proposition 2.3]] records the paper's stronger tower-existence observation. It is not used in the simpler proof of Theorem 1.1.

Dependency and quantitative scope

The same-paper proof is reconstructed in the linked pages. The external inputs are used in the specialized forms stated on the class-tower page: quadratic theory and Koch's generator-rank computation, Shafarevich's relation-rank bound, Golod--Shafarevich infinitude, the tame discriminant bound and Minkowski covolume formula, and the class-number bound cited by the paper to Borel--Prasad. Their proofs are not recursively reproduced, and no external source PDF was compared for this unit. Proposition 2.3 additionally uses Hajir--Maire--Ramakrishna and Chebotarev, outside the direct chain.

For the paper's displayed constants, the logarithmic exponent ratio exceeds 11 by about 6.24⋅10−386.24\cdot10^{-38}. The theorem page chooses a smaller fixed positive exponent so that the prefactor 1/21/2 is absorbed for large sets. This compiles the qualitative fixed-power disproof. Sawin's separate, stronger numerical exponent is a later source obligation, so this record does not claim current-best quantitative completeness. No Lean build or new formalization was performed.

Sections 3--11, on pp. 7--17, are individually signed reflections by the nine authors. They provide history and interpretation, rather than additional steps in the proof chain. The paper also stresses that the ring of integers of a field of degree at least three is not a discrete planar lattice: the construction must first use its full Minkowski lattice and only then project a finite window to one complex coordinate.

Source: arXiv:2605.20695v1.

Bears on. #90 and #92.