Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Source. Theorem 2, p. 3, of David Conlon, Jacob Fox and Benny Sudakov, Large almost monochromatic subsets in hypergraphs, Israel J. Math. 181 (2011), 423--432, DOI 10.1007/s11856-011-0016-6. Pages are those of the author's manuscript identified on the source card, not the journal's pagination.
Statement
Definitions (p. 3). For a -uniform hypergraph , the Ramsey number is the least such that every -coloring of the -tuples of an -element set contains a monochromatic copy of . The complete -partite -uniform hypergraph has parts of size , and its edges are all -sets with their vertices in different parts. The -color Ramsey number is the least such that every -coloring of the -tuples of an -element set contains a monochromatic set of size (p. 2); is thus the -color Ramsey number of the complete graph on vertices.
Theorem 2 (p. 3, quoted). "The -color Ramsey number of the complete -partite hypergraph satisfies , where is the -color Ramsey number of the complete graph on vertices."
Logarithms in the paper are to base , and floor and ceiling signs are omitted where not crucial (p. 3). The paper presents the theorem as answering a question of Erdős and Hajnal (1989): whether some fixed -uniform hypergraph of density larger than on vertices occurs monochromatically in every coloring (pp. 2--3). has edge density more than , which tends to as grows (p. 3).
Proof pointer
Section 3, pp. 4--6, with the two counting lemmas of Section 2 (Lemma 1, p. 3: a bipartite graph with parts , and at least edges contains a complete bipartite graph with vertices in and in ; Lemma 2, p. 4: a graph of order with edges and contains with ), both by the double counting of Kővári, Sós and Turán. The proof adapts the Erdős--Rado upper bound argument, choosing vertex sets instead of single vertices. With , it builds over rounds disjoint sets of size such that for each all triples in with share a color . In each round the sets already chosen shrink by a factor , by Lemma 1 applied to auxiliary bipartite graphs between a set and the pairs (then the edges of nested graphs) in a reservoir , and Lemma 2 then extracts the next set and a new reservoir of size at least . The coloring of the pairs of has a monochromatic clique of size by the definition of , and those sets together with form a monochromatic .
Dependencies
Lemmas 1 and 2 of the same paper, summarized above; the Kővári--Sós--Turán counting and the Erdős--Rado argument are cited, not used as results. Read depth: claims checked; the statement and definitions were read clause by clause on the print, the proof for its structure only. Nothing here is independently reviewed.
Bears on
- Problem 161: only through Theorem 1, which the paper deduces from this theorem; on its own it bounds a Ramsey number and says nothing about .