Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Source. Lemma 2.1, Section 2, p. 2 of arXiv:2406.19491v1 (27 June 2024), the edition named on the source card; the construction on p. 2, the proof on pp. 2-3. Read on the PDF page images.
Statement
Construction (p. 2). For each let be an integer with
where is the -th prime; by Shiu's theorem such an exists, and for sufficiently large one with , the four-fold iterated exponential. Put and, for ,
Lemma 2.1 (p. 2). "The number is transcendental, and hence is irrational."
Read depth. Claims checked: the construction and the lemma were read clause by clause on the page images, and the proof was read in full. Nothing here is independently reviewed.
Proof pointer
pp. 2-3. With and , the fractions are in lowest terms. Since , the exponents grow at least exponentially (), which gives for all large ; Liouville's theorem then rules out being algebraic.
Dependencies
Shiu's theorem (Theorem 1(i) of Shiu, Strings of congruent primes, J. London Math. Soc. (2) 61, 2000) for the existence of ; Liouville's theorem.
Bears on
- Problem 997: the lemma supplies the irrationality of the for which Theorem 1.1 shows that is not well-distributed modulo . On its own it says nothing about well-distribution.