Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Source. Lemma 2.1, Section 2, p. 2 of arXiv:2406.19491v1 (27 June 2024), the edition named on the source card; the construction on p. 2, the proof on pp. 2-3. Read on the PDF page images.

Statement

Construction (p. 2). For each n∈Nn\in\mathbb N let m=m(n)m=m(n) be an integer with

pm+1≡⋯≡pm+n≡1(mod2n),p_{m+1}\equiv\cdots\equiv p_{m+n}\equiv1\pmod{2^n},

where pjp_j is the jj-th prime; by Shiu's theorem such an mm exists, and for nn sufficiently large one with m(n)<exp⁡4(n)m(n)<\exp_4(n), the four-fold iterated exponential. Put n0=1n_0=1 and, for k≥0k\ge0,

mk=m(nk),πk=pmk+nk,nk+1=4πk,andα=∑k=0∞2−nk.m_k=m(n_k),\qquad \pi_k=p_{m_k+n_k},\qquad n_{k+1}=4\pi_k , \qquad\text{and}\qquad \alpha=\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}2^{-n_k}.

Lemma 2.1 (p. 2). "The number α\alpha is transcendental, and hence is irrational."

Read depth. Claims checked: the construction and the lemma were read clause by clause on the page images, and the proof was read in full. Nothing here is independently reviewed.

Proof pointer

pp. 2-3. With qk=2nkq_k=2^{n_k} and ak=2nk∑l≤k2−nla_k=2^{n_k}\sum_{l\le k}2^{-n_l}, the fractions ak/qka_k/q_k are in lowest terms. Since πk>2nk\pi_k>2^{n_k}, the exponents grow at least exponentially (nk+1>2nkn_{k+1}>2^{n_k}), which gives ∣qkα−ak∣<qk−k|q_k\alpha-a_k|<q_k^{-k} for all large kk; Liouville's theorem then rules out α\alpha being algebraic.

Dependencies

Shiu's theorem (Theorem 1(i) of Shiu, Strings of congruent primes, J. London Math. Soc. (2) 61, 2000) for the existence of m(n)m(n); Liouville's theorem.

Bears on

  • Problem 997: the lemma supplies the irrationality of the α\alpha for which Theorem 1.1 shows that (αpn)(\alpha p_n) is not well-distributed modulo 11. On its own it says nothing about well-distribution.