Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Rank Amplification for Shifted Equal Values of Euler's Totient Function

../

corollary_1_5: Bounds the number of consecutive equal-totient solutions using the moving-rank scale sqrt(log x log_2 x).

formalization_claim_section_1_1: Records the preprint's claim of a Lean 4 formalization while granting no independent build, declaration, dependency, or axiom-audit credit.

theorem_1_4: Separates shifted equal-totient solutions into a same-support diagonal and a quantitatively bounded off-diagonal part over a growing shift range.


Eric Li, Rank Amplification for Shifted Equal Values of Euler's Totient Function, arXiv:2606.23681v2. The visible arXiv watermark records the v2 update as 12 August 2026; the manuscript footer is separately dated 22 June 2026.

Copy read. The copy read for this card is the arXiv v2 PDF, with 37 physical and numbered pages; its retrieval time is unknown. The arXiv record names arXiv's non-exclusive distribution license (arXiv:2606.23681), every other right reserved.

For

Shφ(x)=#{n≤x:φ(n)=φ(n+h)},S_h^\varphi(x)=\#\{n\leq x:\varphi(n)=\varphi(n+h)\},

Theorem 1.4 and equation (1.4) give a uniform moving-rank decomposition into an above-cutoff same-support diagonal and an explicit off-diagonal error. This is the general shifted statement and is not Corollary 1.5.

Corollary 1.5, also on p. 3, specializes to the unit shift:

S1φ(x)≪xexp⁡{−(12−o(1))log⁡xlog⁡2x}.S_1^\varphi(x) \ll x\exp\left\{-\left(\frac12-o(1)\right) \sqrt{\log x\log_2x}\right\}.

The proof on p. 35 applies Theorem 1.4 with h=1h=1 and invokes Lemma 9.1 to make the diagonal empty. This upper bound does not prove that the unit-shift solution set is finite or infinite.

The statement that the paper's mathematical results have been formalized is kept separately in the Section 1.1 author-claim record. This payload did not clone or build the repository and did not inspect Lean declarations, dependencies, axioms, or the audit procedure; it grants no independent formal-verification credit.

For Problem 1003, Corollary 1.5 is a new upper bound and Theorem 1.4 explains the shifted decomposition from which it follows. Neither decides infinitude.

Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.23681.

Bears on. #1003.

Results and source claims to transcribe.

Living verification. Needs review. The version/date distinction, Theorem 1.4, Corollary 1.5, Section 1.1 claim, and source proof pointers were checked against that arXiv v2 PDF. No complete analytic proof or Lean verification is supplied, reconstructed, or independently certified here.

No file of this source is held: no license on record permits its redistribution, and the card cites the edition it names above.