Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Statement

The note works with the set T=φ(N)\mathcal T=\varphi(\mathbb N) of values of Euler's function, the two counts

V(x)=#{v∈T:v≤x},V′(x)=#{φ(n):n≤x},V(x)=\#\{v\in\mathcal T:v\le x\},\qquad V'(x)=\#\{\varphi(n):n\le x\},

and the least preimage ℓ(v)=min⁡{n:φ(n)=v}\ell(v)=\min\{n:\varphi(n)=v\} of a totient vv (p. 1). These are the two counts of Problem 417.

Theorem 1 (p. 1). Let

M∗=log⁡22+∑p≥3 primep(p−1)2log⁡pp−1.M_*=\frac{\log2}{2}+\sum_{p\ge3\text{ prime}}\frac{p}{(p-1)^2}\log\frac p{p-1}.

Then

lim sup⁡x→∞V(x)V′(x)≤eM∗<2.195202.\limsup_{x\to\infty}\frac{V(x)}{V'(x)}\le e^{M_*}<2.195202.

The theorem has no hypotheses. Its proof argues for the equivalent lower bound lim inf⁡V′(x)/V(x)≥e−M∗\liminf V'(x)/V(x)\ge e^{-M_*} and ends with the numerical bound M∗<0.786274052M_*<0.786274052 (p. 2).

Source. An explicit bound for Erdős problem 417, two-page note (2026) with no author line; Theorem 1 on p. 1, its proof on pp. 1--2. The edition read is identified on the source card.

Read depth. Claims checked: the statement and the definitions before it were read clause by clause on the page images of the PDF. The proof was read for its structure only and is not verified here; its exact rational prime sum was not recomputed.

Proof pointer

pp. 1--2. Write W(x)W(x) for the sum of v/ℓ(v)v/\ell(v) over the totients v≤xv\le x and Cp(x)C_p(x) for the number of totients v≤xv\le x with p∣ℓ(v)p\mid\ell(v).

  1. Display (1). For a fixed cut HH, the common-prefix estimates of the manuscript's Proposition 5.3 leave, after an error O(εHV(x))+oH(V(x))O(\varepsilon_HV(x))+o_H(V(x)) with εH→0\varepsilon_H\to0, totients of the form v=D(p−1)v=D(p-1) with ℓ(v)=Ap\ell(v)=Ap, where the prime p≥x0.9p\ge x^{0.9} varies and the prefix fixes D≤AD\le A. For each prefix the prime number theorem makes the sum of v/ℓ(v)=(D/A)(1−1/p)v/\ell(v)=(D/A)(1-1/p) over pp asymptotic to the number of these pp with Ap≤xAp\le x, that is, of these vv counted by V′(x)V'(x). The note sums the errors using (x/log⁡x)∑D−1=OH(V(x))(x/\log x)\sum D^{-1}=O_H(V(x)) over the prefixes and lets H→∞H\to\infty, which gives W(x)=V′(x)+o(V(x))W(x)=V'(x)+o(V(x)).
  2. Displays (2)--(4). Removing the exact power pap^a of pp from ℓ(v)\ell(v) leaves a preimage of v/(pa−1(p−1))v/(p^{a-1}(p-1)), so Cp(x)≤∑a≥1V(x/(pa−1(p−1)))C_p(x)\le\sum_{a\ge1}V(x/(p^{a-1}(p-1))). The fixed-scale limit V(cx)/V(x)→cV(cx)/V(x)\to c for fixed c>0c>0, with the bound V(x/k)/V(x)≪k−1/2V(x/k)/V(x)\ll k^{-1/2} uniform in k≥1k\ge1 that iterating it at c=2c=2 gives, yields lim sup⁡Cp(x)/V(x)≤p/(p−1)2\limsup C_p(x)/V(x)\le p/(p-1)^2 by dominated convergence, the sum of the limits 1/(pa−1(p−1))1/(p^{a-1}(p-1)). For p=2p=2, minimality makes a least preimage divisible by 22 divisible by 44, so v/2=φ(ℓ(v)/2)v/2=\varphi(\ell(v)/2) is a totient, C2(x)≤V(x/2)C_2(x)\le V(x/2) and the limit superior is at most 1/21/2.
  3. The mean of log⁡(ℓ(v)/v)\log(\ell(v)/v). Since ℓ(v)/v\ell(v)/v is the product of p/(p−1)p/(p-1) over the primes p∣ℓ(v)p\mid\ell(v), this mean over the totients v≤xv\le x equals ∑pCp(x)log⁡(p/(p−1))/V(x)\sum_pC_p(x)\log(p/(p-1))/V(x). Each term is ≪p−3/2\ll p^{-3/2} uniformly in xx, so the bounds of step 2 pass through the sum, and the mean has limit superior at most M∗M_*: the weight 1/21/2 at p=2p=2 and p/(p−1)2p/(p-1)^2 at odd pp, times log⁡(p/(p−1))\log(p/(p-1)).
  4. Jensen's inequality. The mean of v/ℓ(v)v/\ell(v), which is W(x)/V(x)W(x)/V(x), is at least the exponential of minus the mean of log⁡(ℓ(v)/v)\log(\ell(v)/v). With step 1 this gives lim inf⁡V′(x)/V(x)≥e−M∗\liminf V'(x)/V(x)\ge e^{-M_*}, which is the theorem.
  5. The constant (p. 2). At z=1/(2p−1)z=1/(2p-1) one has log⁡(p/(p−1))=log⁡((1+z)/(1−z))\log(p/(p-1))=\log((1+z)/(1-z)), which the note bounds above by U(z)U(z), the odd power series truncated after z17z^{17} plus a geometric bound for the remainder. It reports that exact rational summation of 12U(1/3)\tfrac12U(1/3) and the terms p(p−1)−2U(1/(2p−1))p(p-1)^{-2}U(1/(2p-1)) for the primes 3≤p≤N3\le p\le N, with N=999990N=999990, stays below 0.7862737850.786273785, and it bounds the primes above NN by the integers prime to 3030 and an integral, for M∗<0.786274052M_*<0.786274052 and eM∗<2.195202e^{M_*}<2.195202.

Dependencies

  • Theorem 2.1 of OpenAI, An asymptotic formula for the number of totients (p. 4), through its last clause only: V(cx)/V(x)→cV(cx)/V(x)\to c for every fixed c>0c>0. That clause is accepted on Problem 416 with formalized evidence.
  • Proposition 5.3 of the same manuscript (p. 27), its common prefix for all preimages: outside a small exceptional set, with bounds for the exceptional values and their tuples, every totient up to tt has a unique tuple (p0,…,pR,d)(p_0,\ldots,p_R,d), every preimage shares its prefix, and ℓ(v)=p0⋯pR ℓ(d)\ell(v)=p_0\cdots p_R\,\ell(d). It has no result page here and was not checked; the manuscript, unrefereed, is filed as openai_2026_asymptotic_formula_number_totients.
  • The prime number theorem, dominated convergence and Jensen's inequality.

The note cites the manuscript (its reference [1]) by title, date and its folder on the release's main branch, not by a fixed revision; the two labels it uses carry the content it attributes to them in the edition the manuscript's card identifies.

Standing

Claimed and unreviewed. The theorem rests on Proposition 5.3 through step 1, while the fixed-scale limit it takes from Theorem 2.1 is the accepted clause. A review would have to check at least the derivation of display (1) from Proposition 5.3, including the bound (x/log⁡x)∑D−1=OH(V(x))(x/\log x)\sum D^{-1}=O_H(V(x)) that the note states without a reference, Proposition 5.3 itself, and the exact prime sum; none of this was done here. The proof of the project's conditional claim L44 writes out its own versions of displays (1)--(4) from premises taken from the same manuscript; it is author-recorded at tier 0 and is not a review of the note.

Bears on

  • Problem 417: the theorem claims an explicit upper bound, eM∗<2.195202e^{M_*}<2.195202, for the limit superior of the problem's ratio V(x)/V′(x)V(x)/V'(x). It does not show that the limit exists, so it settles neither question.