Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Lai 2021 largest prime divisor
least_prime_divisor_bound: States an improved upper bound for the odd-index liminf of the least prime divisor of n!+1.
lemma_2_7: Bounds a sum of running minima of p-adic valuations over distinct shifted factorial values.
theorem_1_1: Gives a 1+9 log 2 limsup bound, with a positive-lower-density strengthening, for every nonzero polynomial shift of n!.
Li Lai, On the largest prime divisor of , arXiv:2103.14894v1 (27 March 2021).
The selected arXiv v1 PDF has 11 physical pages. It is a factorial-sequence paper; it does not concern the exponential sequence of Problem 977 and is not direct progress on that problem. The arXiv record names arXiv's non-exclusive distribution license (arXiv:2103.14894), every other right reserved.
For every nonzero , Theorem 1.1 proves
More strongly, for each fixed the inequality , together with , holds on a set of positive integers whose lower asymptotic density is positive. This improves the constants of Luca--Shparlinski for general polynomial shifts and of Stewart for .
The new ingredient is Lemma 2.7, a simultaneous -adic valuation bound over an ordered family of distinct factorial arguments. The proof of Theorem 1.1 in Section 3 applies that estimate to the prime-power contributions in a large product of values . The introduction also states two further applications of the method: an improved upper bound, approximately , for the odd-index liminf of the least prime divisor of , and, on the same p. 2, an improvement of Luca--Shparlinski's lower bound for to . The paper gives no separate derivation of either application.
Results.
- Theorem 1.1: polynomially shifted factorials
- Lemma 2.7: simultaneous valuation bound
- Unnumbered least-prime-divisor application
The result pages contain exact statements and proof pointers only. No complete proof is transcribed.
Bears on. #977 (context only): Theorem 1.1 with gives for the factorial variant that the problem's catalog remarks mention; it does not show that tends to infinity and says nothing about .
No file of this source is held: no license on record permits its redistribution, and the card cites the edition it names above.