Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Source. Displays (3) and (4), p. 2, in the proof of Proposition 1 of A Two-Copy Proof of Erdős Problem 126 (2026), a three-page preliminary exposition with no printed author, posted at https://www.erdosproblems.com/static/126-proof.pdf; the edition read is identified on the source card. The step is unlabelled in the print; this page names it.
Statement
Setting (pp. 1–2). is a finite set with elements and a finite labelled family of subsets of , each with at least two elements, any two of whose supports are disjoint or nested; equal supports with different labels are allowed. For each , is a smallest support in containing , or when no support contains .
Claim (p. 2, display (3)). There is an injection
So each vertex is the value for at most two .
Consequence (p. 2, display (4)). For any weights , with , minimality of gives for every .
Read depth. Claims checked: displays (3) and (4) and the Hall argument between them were read clause by clause on p. 2. Nothing here is independently reviewed.
Proof sketch
P. 2. For , let be the union of the punctured sets over . The sets with are pairwise disjoint, by laminarity and because no such lies in another such . Choosing one point from each punctured set maps injectively into , so . This is Hall's condition for the bipartite graph joining to the two copies of , and a matching covering is the injection . Every support containing is a chain member containing , hence contains , which gives (4).
Dependencies
Hall's marriage theorem: P. Hall, On Representatives of Subsets, Journal of the London Mathematical Society 10 (1935), 26–30, DOI, compiled as Hall's Theorem 1.
Used by. Proposition 1.
Bears on
- Problem 126: the matching is the step of Proposition 1 that gives its second estimate and the constant ; it bears on the problem only through the main theorem.