Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Source. The opening paragraph, p. 1, and §2 "Prime-power residue families", p. 3, of A Two-Copy Proof of Erdős Problem 126 (2026), a three-page preliminary exposition with no printed author, posted at https://www.erdosproblems.com/static/126-proof.pdf; the edition read is identified on the source card. The result is unnumbered in the print; this page names it the main theorem.
Statement
Main theorem (p. 1, quoted). "Let be finite, and let be the number of primes dividing at least one sum with distinct . We prove , where the implied constant is absolute."
The print lets contain : §2 (p. 3) removes from and restores it at the end. It concludes, also on p. 1, that the extremal function of Problem 126 satisfies and hence ; the print does not define itself.
Explicit constants (derived on this page, not printed). Write for the set of primes in the statement, so . Tracking the constants in the proof of Proposition 1 gives for a set of positive integers, and for every finite
The additive is needed: has empty . With the
least value of over -element sets, as on the problem page, this
gives for . The same constants appear as
card_le_three_sq and quadraticBound in the pinned formal module named on
the source card.
Read depth. Claims checked: the statement and the argument of §2 were read clause by clause on the printed pages, and the explicit constants above were derived here from that argument. Nothing here is independently reviewed.
Proof sketch
P. 3. Remove , index the remaining elements , and let be the primes dividing some off-diagonal sum. For each and each level , the negation orbits modulo with and both classes occupied are retained as labelled supports of weight ; for a fixed they form a laminar family. Each element gets the sign of its -free part, read modulo for odd and modulo for , from a sign choice that is opposite on each pair ; this separates the two classes of each retained orbit. The self-opposite classes are collected in a positive semidefinite kernel .
Off the diagonal, unique factorization of gives , displayed as (7), and of gives , displayed as (8); since , . On the diagonal and , so the [[arithmetic_functions/adamczewski_2026_erdos126/logarithmic_kernel|logarithmic kernel]] exceeds only by a nonnegative diagonal. Hence is conditionally negative semidefinite, and Proposition 1 bounds . Restoring adds at most one element and does not enlarge the set of primes.
The constants above come from Proposition 1's bound when ; when , .
Dependencies
Proposition 1 and the [[arithmetic_functions/adamczewski_2026_erdos126/logarithmic_kernel|logarithmic kernel identity]] of the same exposition; elementary prime factorization.
Bears on
- Problem 126: the problem asks whether , where is the largest number such that every -element set of natural numbers has at least distinct prime factors in its product of off-diagonal pair sums. That number is the least over such sets, so the theorem gives and answers the question affirmatively. The exposition is not refereed; the problem's standing is recorded on its claim pages.