Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Source. Section 2° (statement p. 513, with condition (7); the section's lemma p. 514; the construction pp. 515--517, ending with formula (22) and the growth estimate on p. 517) of A. A. Gol'dberg, Sets on which the modulus of an entire function has a lower bound (Russian), Sibirsk. Mat. Zh. 20 (1979), no. 3, 512--518, 691, the edition named on the source card.

Statement

Setting as in section 1°: E(c)={z:∣f(z)∣>c}E(c)=\{z:|f(z)|>c\}, ∣E(c)∣|E(c)| its planar measure, and M(r,f)=max⁡{∣f(z)∣:∣z∣=r}M(r,f)=\max\{|f(z)|:|z|=r\}.

Result of 2° (p. 513). Let Φ\Phi be an arbitrary continuous, positive, nondecreasing function on [0,∞)[0,\infty) such that

∫1∞{Φ(r)}−1 r dr<∞.(7)\int_1^{\infty}\{\Phi(r)\}^{-1}\,r\,dr<\infty . \qquad (7)

Then there is an entire function ff such that ln⁡ln⁡M(r,f)=O(Φ(r))\ln\ln M(r,f)=O(\Phi(r)) as r→∞r\to\infty and ∣E(c)∣<∞|E(c)|<\infty for every c>0c>0.

The paper presents this as showing that relation (6) of 1° cannot be sharpened in this sense.

Read depth. Claims checked: the statement, the lemma and the outline of the construction were read on the page images of pp. 513--517. The estimates (13)--(21) were not rechecked, the cited theorems of Boichuk and Warschawski and the continuation of ff to an entire function, which the paper obtains by standard methods with references to Evgrafov and to Gol'dberg and Ostrovskii (p. 516), were not checked against their sources, and nothing here is independently reviewed.

Proof pointer

Pages 514--517, outlined here.

  • Lemma (p. 514; the paper says on p. 513 that its proof was communicated to the author by V. S. Boichuk). There is a twice continuously differentiable positive function LL on [0,∞)[0,\infty) with L(r)r2=O(Φ(r))L(r)r^2=O(\Phi(r)) as r→∞r\to\infty, ∫1∞dr/(rL(r))<∞\int_1^\infty dr/(rL(r))<\infty (8), and rL′(r)=o(L(r))rL'(r)=o(L(r)) as r→∞r\to\infty. The print states the last condition as "r2L′(r)=o(L(r))r^2L'(r)=o(L(r))" [sic]; the proof (p. 515) establishes rkL(k)(r)=o(L(r))r^kL^{(k)}(r)=o(L(r)) for k=1,2k=1,2, so it is meant as r2L′′(r)=o(L(r))r^2L''(r)=o(L(r)). The proof (pp. 514--515) regularizes Φ\Phi through a function of first order and convergence class and uses a theorem of Boichuk on proximate orders.
  • Construction (pp. 515--517). With θ(x)=1/(x2L(x))′\theta(x)=1/(x^2L(x))', which behaves like (2xL(x))−1(2xL(x))^{-1} by (13), the paper takes the curvilinear half-strips S(q)={x>0, ∣y∣<qθ(x)/2}S(q)=\{x>0,\ |y|<q\theta(x)/2\}, a conformal map ζ\zeta of S(1)S(1) onto the half-strip {ξ>0, ∣η∣<π/2}\{\xi>0,\ |\eta|<\pi/2\} with asymptotics (14) from a theorem of Warschawski, and defines ff outside S(3/4)S(3/4) as the Cauchy integral of F=exp⁡exp⁡(2ζ)F=\exp\exp(2\zeta) over the boundary of S(3/4)S(3/4). This extends to an entire function equal to that integral plus exp⁡exp⁡(2ζ(z))\exp\exp(2\zeta(z)) inside S(3/4)S(3/4) (17), and ff is O(1/z)O(1/z) outside S(3/4)S(3/4) (22). Hence for each c>0c>0 the set E(c)E(c) lies in a disc together with S(1)S(1), whose area ∫0∞θ(x) dx\int_0^\infty\theta(x)\,dx is finite by (13) and (8); and ln⁡ln⁡M(r,f)≤(1+o(1))4πr2L(r)=O(Φ(r))\ln\ln M(r,f)\le(1+o(1))4\pi r^2L(r)=O(\Phi(r)).

Dependencies

Section 1° supplies the bound this result shows to be sharp. The construction cites V. S. Boichuk, Sibirsk. Mat. Zh. 20 (1979), no. 2, 229--236, and S. E. Warschawski's theorem on conformal maps of infinite strips (Matematika 2 (1958), no. 4, 67--116).

Bears on

  • Problem 1118: the problem's first question asks for the minimal growth of a non-constant entire ff for which E(c)E(c) has finite measure for some cc. Together with section 1°, this page shows that Hayman's convergence condition is best possible: for every Φ\Phi satisfying (7) some entire ff with ln⁡ln⁡M(r,f)=O(Φ(r))\ln\ln M(r,f)=O(\Phi(r)) has ∣E(c)∣<∞|E(c)|<\infty, and indeed for every c>0c>0.