Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Kohonen 2017 improved lower bound finite additive 2
equation_1: The main result of the paper: a generalized Mrose construction shows that the largest interval [0, n] covered by the sumset of a set of k non-negative integers satisfies liminf n(k)/k^2 >= 85/294, improving the previous 2/7.
theorem_1: The construction behind the paper's main bound: a generalized Mrose basis with 42 elementary segments whose sumset covers 510 consecutive blocks of t^2 integers from zero, giving bases of size 42t + 7 and range at least 510 t^2, hence the ratio 510/42^2 = 85/294.
Kohonen, Jukka, An improved lower bound for finite additive 2-bases. J. Number Theory 174 (2017), 518--524.
An additive 2-basis A (a set of non-negative integers) has size k = |A| and range n(A), the largest n with {0,...,n} contained in A+A, and n(k) denotes the maximal range over bases of size k. The paper's main result (equation (1)) is liminf_{k->infinity} n(k)/k^2 >= 85/294 > 0.2891, improving the previous explicit lower bound 2/7 > 0.2857 coming from Mrose's construction and from the construction of Kløve and Mossige; the upper bound it quotes is Yu's limsup n(k)/k^2 <= 0.4585. The method is a generalized Mrose construction: three elementary segments V = [0,t], H = [0,(t),t^2-t] and S = [0,(t+1),t^2-1], visualized as a vertical line, a horizontal line and a slanted line in the planar coordinates i -> (floor(i/t), i mod t), are translated by multiples of t^2 along index sets I, J, K to form A = (V + t^2 I) union (H + t^2 J) union (S + t^2 K), and Facts 1-3 show the pairwise sumsets V+H, V+S and H+S cover translated squares Q = [0,t^2-1] and parallelograms, so that a good placement (I,J,K) yields a long range; Theorem 1 (p. 3) gives a placement of 42 segments covering 510 consecutive squares, hence bases of size 42t+7 and range at least 510t^2 (p. 5). For problem 791, which asks for the growth of the least size g(n) of an additive 2-basis covering {0,...,n}, the inverse of n(k), this raises the constructive lower bound for liminf n(k)/k^2 to 85/294, that is, g(n)^2 <= (294/85 + o(1))n.
The copy read for this card is arXiv:1606.04770v2 (10 January 2017, "Author's final version", 6 pp.), whose pagination is used here; the journal version is J. Number Theory 174 (2017), 518--524, DOI 10.1016/j.jnt.2016.11.011 (Crossref record read), not compared. Conventions (p. 1): the size counts the zero element ("Often in the literature the zero is not counted, but this makes no difference in the asymptotic ratios"), and the range means with . The site's for Problem 791, the least size of with , is the inverse function (elements above can be dropped from a basis without losing the sums up to ), so equation (1) reads and Yu's bound reads ; the conversion is written on the problem page. Read status: claims checked for the definitions, equation (1) and the introduction's quoted bounds (p. 1, text layer) on 2026-09-18; equation (2) and Facts 1--3 (p. 2) read as statements; Theorem 1 (p. 3) and the consequence on pp. 4--5 checked clause by clause on the page images on 2026-10-08, with the proof's covering steps (p. 4) followed and Facts 1--3 not reproved. Result pages: equation (1) (p. 1) and Theorem 1 (p. 3). The arXiv record names arXiv's non-exclusive distribution license (arXiv:1606.04770), every other right reserved.
Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/1606.04770.
Bears on. #791: equation (1) (p. 1), obtained from Theorem 1 (p. 3), gives through g(n) = min{k : n(k) >= n} the upper bound g(n)^2 <= (294/85 + o(1))n for the problem's estimate; since 294/85 < 4 it also shows that g(n) ~ 2n^{1/2} fails, which earlier constructions had already shown. It does not determine the growth of g(n)^2/n. The paper does not mention the problem.
Results to transcribe.
- Equation (1) (main result, p. 1; result page written): liminf_{k->infinity} n(k)/k^2 >= 85/294 > 0.2891, where n(k) is the maximal range of an additive 2-basis of size k.
- Generalized Mrose basis (equation (2), p. 2; stated on the Theorem 1 page): For segment length t and placements I, J, K with |I|+|J|+|K| = l, the set A = (V + t^2 I) union (H + t^2 J) union (S + t^2 K) built from the elementary segments V, H, S is a generalized Mrose basis, whose sumset covers unions of translated squares and parallelograms; when these cover m consecutive squares from 0, A is an additive 2-basis of size k <= l(t+1) and range n >= mt^2 - 1 (p. 3). Theorem 1 (p. 3; result page written): a placement with l = 42 covers m = 510 squares.
- Facts 1-3: V+H and V+S each contain the square Q = [0,t^2-1]; two consecutive parallelograms P = H+S and P+t^2 together contain Q+t^2; and translating elementary segments translates their sumsets.
No file of this source is held: no license on record permits its redistribution, and the card cites the edition it names above.