Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Balogh 2015 number maximal sum free subsets integers

../

question_1_2: The 2015 question whether the number of maximal sum-free subsets of the first n integers is O(2^{n/4}), posed after the paper's exponent theorem and answered yes by the same authors' 2018 asymptotic.

theorem_1_1: The 2015 theorem that the Cameron–Erdős lower bound 2^{⌊n/4⌋} for the number of maximal sum-free subsets of the first n integers is correct in the exponent, answering the question whether that number is o(2^{n/2}).


Balogh, József and Liu, Hong and Sharifzadeh, Maryam and Treglown, Andrew, The number of maximal sum-free subsets of integers. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 143 (2015), no. 11, 4713--4721, DOI 10.1090/S0002-9939-2015-12615-9 (Crossref record read).

The copy read for this card is arXiv:1409.5661v1 (19 September 2014; ten pages; "to appear in the Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society" per its arXiv comment), the only arXiv version on 2026-09-18; the journal version was not compared, and page numbers below are the preprint's. The paper attributes the question and the lower bound 2^(floor(n/4)) to Cameron and Erdős's 1999 paper (Combin. Probab. Comput. 8 (1999), 95--107, its [6]) and the conjecture f(n) = O(2^(n/2)) to their 1990 Banff paper (its [5]); the site keys problem 877 to the 1990 paper. Read status: claims checked for the definitions, the attribution paragraph, the Łuczak--Schoen and Wolfovitz bounds as quoted, Theorem 1.1, the two constructions and Question 1.2 (pp. 1--2; p. 2 on the page image); Section 2's tools (Lemma 2.1, Theorem 2.2, Lemmas 2.3--2.4) read as statements; the proof (Section 3) not read; nothing here is independently reviewed. The statement is on theorem_1_1. The arXiv record names arXiv's non-exclusive distribution license (arXiv:1409.5661), every other right reserved.

Theorem 1.1 shows that [n] = {1, ..., n} has at most 2^((1/4+o(1))n) maximal sum-free subsets, so f_max(n) = 2^((1/4+o(1))n) and the Cameron-Erdos lower bound 2^(floor(n/4)) is asymptotically correct in the exponent. This settles the growth rate left open by Luczak and Schoen's 2^(n/2 - 2^{-28} n) bound and Wolfovitz's 2^(3n/8+o(n)). The proof combines Green's container and removal lemmas for sum-free sets with the Deshouillers-Freiman-Sos-Temkin structure theorem, reducing the count to bounding numbers of maximal independent sets in auxiliary link graphs. The paper also exhibits, for 4 | n, a second family of 2^(n/4) maximal sum-free sets and poses Question 1.2, whether f_max(n) = O(2^(n/4)), which it leaves open. For problem 877 this answers the displayed question f_m(n) = o(2^(n/2)) (first answered by Luczak and Schoen) and determines the exponent of the count, not the count itself, which the authors' 2018 paper gives.

Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/1409.5661.

Bears on. #877: Theorem 1.1 (p. 2) answers the problem's displayed question fm(n)=o(2n/2)f_m(n)=o(2^{n/2}) with the order 2(1/4+o(1))n2^{(1/4+o(1))n}; the paper's fmax⁡f_{\max} is the site's fmf_m. Question 1.2 (p. 2) asks whether fm(n)=O(2n/4)f_m(n)=O(2^{n/4}), a sharpening of the problem's request to estimate fm(n)f_m(n); this paper poses it without answering it.

Results to transcribe.

  • Theorem 1.1 (p. 2): the number f_max(n) of maximal sum-free subsets of [n] is at most 2^((1/4+o(1))n); with the Cameron-Erdos construction this gives f_max(n) = 2^((1/4+o(1))n).
  • Question 1.2 (p. 2): does f_max(n) = O(2^(n/4))? Left open here; answered yes by the authors' 2018 asymptotic.
  • Second lower-bound family (p. 2): for 4 | n, the set made of n/4, a set S of elements of (3n/4, n], and x - n/4 for each other x in (3n/4, n] extends to a maximal sum-free set, distinct S giving distinct ones, so there are at least 2^(n/4) of them; recorded on the Question 1.2 page.

No file of this source is held: no license on record permits its redistribution, and the card cites the edition it names above.