Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Erdos 1994 sum sets sidon sets i
problem_5: The paper's Problem 5 asks whether a finite set A with |A+A| = (1/2 + o(1))|A|^2 must have |B(A+A,d)| large, perhaps of order |A|^2, for all d, and records that the proof method of Theorem 2 does not adapt to it.
problem_7: The paper's Problem 7 asks whether some Sidon set A in {1,...,n} with |A| ≪ n^{1/3} is maximal, so that no b in {1,...,n} outside A can be added keeping the Sidon property; it is the question of Problem 156.
problem_9: The paper's Problem 9 defines B_2[g] sets, proposes extending its results to them, and asks whether every infinite B_2[2] set has liminf A(n)n^{-1/2} = 0, the question of Problem 158.
theorem_1: Erdős, Sárközy and Sós's theorem that for every finite Sidon set A and every d in N more than c_1|A|^2 elements s of A+A have s-d outside A+A, so A+A splits into more than c_1|A|^2 blocks of consecutive integers.
theorem_2: Erdős, Sárközy and Sós's infinite analogue of Theorem 1: for every infinite Sidon set A and every d in N, limsup over N of B(S_A,d,N)/A(N)^2 exceeds an absolute constant c_2, and c_2 = 10^{-7} can be taken.
theorem_3: Erdős, Sárközy and Sós's theorem that for n > n_0 some Sidon set in {1,...,n} has a sumset meeting every window {i+1,...,i+H}, i = 0,...,n, with H at most 3n^{1/2}.
theorem_4: Erdős, Sárközy and Sós's theorem that for every ε > 0 some Sidon set has sumset s_1 < s_2 < ... with s_{i+1} - s_i < s_i^{1/2}(log s_i)^{(3/2)+ε} for all i beyond some i_0, proved by the Erdős–Rényi random method.
theorem_5: Erdős, Sárközy and Sós's theorem that for an absolute c_4 > 0 every finite Sidon set A with |A| >= 2 has two consecutive elements of A+A more than c_4 log|A| apart, proved by adapting the proof of Erdős's bound (11.1).
P. Erdős, A. Sárközy, V. T. Sós, On Sum Sets of Sidon Sets, I. Journal of Number Theory 47 (1994), 329-347. doi:10.1006/jnth.1994.1040.
The paper studies the sum set S_A = A+A of a Sidon set, the extreme opposite of Freiman's near-minimal case. Theorem 1 gives a positive constant c_1 with |B(S_A,d)| >> |A|^2 for every finite Sidon set A and every d, so S_A splits into at least of order |A|^2 blocks of consecutive integers; Theorem 2 is the infinite analog, a limsup lower bound with c_2 = 10^{-7} admissible, and a greedy recursive construction shows limsup cannot be replaced by liminf. Sections 9-11 (Theorems 3-5) bound the gaps between consecutive elements of S_A, ending with the lower bound c_4 log |A| for the largest gap when A is finite with |A| >= 2 (Theorem 5, p. 343). Section 12 lists Problems 1-9. Problem 7 (p. 346) is the origin of Erdős problem 156: it asks whether there is a maximal Sidon set A in {1,...,n} with |A| << n^{1/3}, maximal meaning no b in {1,...,n} outside A can be added keeping the Sidon property. Problem 9 (pp. 346-347) is the origin of problem 158: it asks whether Erdős's bound (11.1), liminf A(n) n^{-1/2} (log n)^{1/2} < infinity for infinite Sidon sets, extends to B_2[2] and more generally B_2[g] sets, which it restates as whether every infinite B_2[2] set has liminf A(n) n^{-1/2} = 0, noting even the maximal-size asymptotics for B_2[g] sets in {1,...,n} is unknown. The paper poses both questions rather than resolving them.
Source: https://doi.org/10.1006/jnth.1994.1040. The copy read for this card is the publisher's scan, which prints "Copyright © 1994 by Academic Press, Inc. All rights of reproduction in any form reserved." at the foot of its first page (p. 329; read on the page image, as the scan has no text layer), every other right reserved.
Read status: claims checked. The statements of Theorems 1 to 5, the definitions on pp. 329--330 and 337, (11.1) and Problems 5, 7 and 9 were read clause by clause on the page images of the journal print; the proofs of Theorems 2 to 5 were read but not checked step by step.
Bears on.
- #156: Problem 7 (p. 346) is this problem, with for . The paper poses it and does not resolve it.
- #158: the question that closes Problem 9 (p. 347) is this problem. The paper recalls Erdős's bound (11.1) (p. 343), which answers it yes for Sidon sets, poses the case of two representations and does not resolve it.
- #864: sets of this problem whose size tends to infinity meet the nearly Sidon hypothesis of Problem 5 (p. 346), a deduction recorded on that page. Problem 5 asks about the sumset's block structure, not the set's size, and is unresolved; the paper's Theorem 1 and Theorem 2 need Sidon sets. The paper gives no bound for the problem.
Results.
- Theorem 1 (p. 330): there is such that every finite Sidon set and every satisfy ; with , has blocks of consecutive integers.
- Theorem 2 (p. 331): for every infinite Sidon set and every , , an absolute constant, and can be taken; the limsup cannot be replaced by a liminf.
- Theorem 3 (p. 337): for .
- Theorem 4 (p. 338): for every some Sidon set has for .
- Theorem 5 (p. 343): there is an absolute such that every finite Sidon set with has a sumset gap above .
- Problem 5 (p. 346): whether sets with must have large for all .
- Problem 7 (p. 346): whether a maximal Sidon set in can have .
- Problem 9 (pp. 346--347): extending the results to sets, and whether every infinite set has .
Overview
The paper studies the spacing and additive structure of the sumset of a Sidon set, where every unordered pair from has a distinct sum. Equation (2.1) (p. 329) records the extremal sumset bound that characterizes this setting. Theorem 1 (p. 330) asserts that, for every finite Sidon set and every positive integer , more than elements of have no predecessor at distance in . Theorem 2, equation (3.2) (p. 331), gives an infinite-set analogue with a limsup normalized by ; the authors state that the constant may be and give a construction showing why a liminf cannot replace the limsup (p. 331). They supply the proof of Theorem 2, using Parseval’s formula on , a lower bound from elements of lacking a predecessor at distance (equations (6.1)–(6.4), pp. 333–334), and an upper bound from the assumed scarcity of such elements in (equations (7.1)–(7.13), pp. 334–336). The finite proof is omitted.
For gaps in , Theorem 3 (pp. 337–338) constructs, for every , a Sidon set in whose sumset meets every interval , , with ; the construction uses the least residues of squares modulo a prime. Theorem 4 (pp. 338–342) constructs, for each , an infinite Sidon set with successive sumset gaps below eventually. Its probabilistic proof selects integers independently, applies Borel–Cantelli to eventual uniqueness of sums and occupancy of prescribed intervals (Lemmas 1 and 2, pp. 339–342), then removes an initial segment. In the opposite direction, Theorem 5 (pp. 343–345) gives a gap exceeding for every finite Sidon set of size at least two; its proof adapts a cited density argument. The stronger gap estimates proposed after Theorems 3 and 4, and the questions in §12 (pp. 345–347), are conjectural or open. In particular, Problem 7 (p. 346) asks whether there is an inclusion-maximal Sidon set in of size .
Relation to E156
This source bears on Problem 156.
Problem 7 (p. 346) is E156: with , it asks whether some Sidon has and no can be adjoined. In the paper’s notation , this maximality condition is equivalent to saying that every such satisfies either or : each condition creates a repeated sum upon adjoining . Consequently, equation (2.1) gives the elementary necessary bound , hence . This is a deduction from the paper’s definition and sumset count, not its construction of a set at that scale.
Theorem 1 (p. 330) supplies a uniform lower bound on boundaries of under every fixed shift; it could constrain a proposed construction’s sumset, but it gives no coverage of the candidates in the maximality condition. Theorem 3 (pp. 337–338) constructs a set with relatively small gaps in , at a scale of roughly elements, and does not establish inclusion-maximality. Theorems 2, 4, and 5 concern infinite sets or sumset gaps and likewise do not supply the required maximal set. The paper poses E156 rather than resolving it.
Relation to E864
This source bears on Problem 864.
The notation used below: is the sumset of a Sidon set , in which every unordered pair, including diagonal pairs, has a distinct sum; ; and Theorem 1 (p. 330) gives for every finite Sidon set and every positive . The passages used for E864 are Theorem 1 (p. 330), Theorem 2 with equation (3.2) (p. 331), Theorems 3–5 (pp. 337–345), and §12 (pp. 345–347), in particular the extension to ‘nearly’ Sidon sets proposed as Problem 5 (p. 346) and the extension to sets in Problem 9 (pp. 346–347); the authors state on p. 346 that the proof method of Theorem 2 does not adapt to Problem 5, and cite the standard Sidon size estimate in Problem 9 (p. 347).
In E864 notation, counts exactly the unordered representations used in this paper. If and is its sole sum with , put . Then and , so every E864 set satisfies the near-Sidon sumset-size hypothesis discussed in §12, Problem 5 (p. 346). That problem is explicitly unresolved here; the authors also say the proof method of Theorem 2 does not adapt to it.
Deleting one element from each of disjoint pairs representing leaves a Sidon subset of size . Theorem 1 can therefore be applied to that subset’s sumset, but its block bound does not transfer automatically to : the deleted elements can fill gaps. The standard Sidon size estimate cited in §12, Problem 9 (p. 347) gives at most for this subset. Thus this route provides little control when is of order , the regime relevant to E864’s proposed constant. Theorems 3–5 concern sumset gaps, and Problem 9 concerns a uniform bound ; neither supplies an upper bound for E864, where the one exceptional multiplicity may grow with . The paper is useful chiefly as a source of sumset methods and as an explicit record of their stated limit for nearly Sidon sets.
No file of this source is held: no license on record permits its redistribution, and the card cites the edition it names above.