Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Erdos 1982 problems additive number theory
problem_p114: Erdős asks for the largest value g(N) of binom(k_1,2) + binom(k_2,2) over two sequences whose differences, taken together, are all distinct, records binom(f(N),2) <= g(N) < (1+o(1))N/2, and asks in (5) whether g(N) < binom(f(N),2) + O(1).
theorem_p114: Erdős's theorem that if sequences A_1, ..., A_m have all their differences distinct and in [1,N], with pairwise disjoint difference sets, then for every eps > 0 there is eta > 0 such that, for N > N_0(eps, eta), |D| > (1+eps)N/2 forces m > eta N.
Erdős, P., Some problems on additive number theory. Annals of Discrete Mathematics 12 (Theory and Practice of Combinatorics), 113--116, 1982. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-0208(08)73496-0
Erdős opens (p. 113) with the Erdős–Turán conjecture (1) that the largest Sidon set in has size , recalling the known bounds (2) and his prize offer. He then recalls perfect systems of difference sets (p. 113) and Abrham's bound for them. His main Theorem (p. 114) concerns systems of integer sequences whose differences (4) are all distinct and all lie in , with pairwise disjoint difference sets : for every there is such that, for , if then , so a large difference set needs many component sequences. The proof (pp. 114--115) adapts the Erdős–Turán counting argument, and pp. 115--116 sketch how Abrham's bound follows from the Theorem. On p. 114 he asks for over two sequences in whose differences, taken together, are all distinct, notes that the Theorem gives and that trivially , asks whether (5) , and asks whether .
Source: https://users.renyi.hu/~p_erdos/Erdos.html. The file prints "© North-Holland Publishing Company" in the header of its first page (p. 113), every other right reserved.
Bears on. #43: question (5) of the Problem (p. 114) is the problem's first question, since two sequences whose differences are all distinct are two Sidon sets with ; the problem's second question, the case , is not in this paper. The paper poses (5) and does not resolve it; the Theorem gives only the upper bound .
Results.
- Theorem (p. 114): if the differences (4) of are all distinct and in and the are pairwise disjoint, then for every there is such that, for , implies ; the page also records the deduction of Abrham's bound (pp. 115--116).
- Problem and question (5) (p. 114): estimate ; the paper records , asks whether , and asks whether .
No file of this source is held: no license on record permits its redistribution, and the card cites the edition it names above.