Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Cilleruelo 2008 perfect difference sets constructed sidon sets

../

problem_1: The paper's Problem 1 asks whether some perfect difference set has t_n = o(n^3), where t_n is the smaller member of the unique representation of n as a difference of two elements; the paper leaves it open.

theorem_1: For every Sidon set B and every function omega(x) tending to infinity there is a perfect difference set A of positive integers whose counting function satisfies A(x) >= B(x/3) - omega(x).

theorem_2: There is a perfect difference set of positive integers with counting function A(x) >> x^(sqrt2-1+o(1)), which answers affirmatively Lev's question whether A(x) >> x^delta is possible for some delta > 1/3.

theorem_3: There is a perfect difference set A with limsup A(x)/sqrt(x) >= 1/sqrt2, extending to perfect difference sets Krückeberg's bound for Sidon sets.


Cilleruelo, Javier and Nathanson, Melvyn B., Perfect difference sets constructed from Sidon sets. Combinatorica 28 (2008), no. 4, 401--414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00493-008-2339-4

A perfect difference set is a set A of integers in which each nonzero integer arises as a difference a - a' of elements of A in exactly one way; counting forces A(x) << x^{1/2}, and the greedy algorithm only gives A(x) >> x^{1/3}. Theorem 1 shows that from any Sidon set B one can build a perfect difference set A of positive integers with A(x) >= B(x/3) - omega(x) for any omega tending to infinity, by dilating B by 3, deleting a thin subset, and then, for each k not yet a difference, adjoining a pair u_{2k}, u_{2k+1} with u_{2k+1} - u_{2k} = k drawn from a very sparse auxiliary sequence. Combining this with Ruzsa's Sidon set gives Theorem 2, a perfect difference set with A(x) >> x^{sqrt(2)-1+o(1)}, which answers affirmatively Seva Lev's question (CANT 2004) whether A(x) >> x^delta is possible for some delta > 1/3. The exponent in Theorem 2 is printed as sqrt(2)-1+o(1) (p. 2), while the abstract and Ruzsa's input bound, quoted on the same page, carry sqrt(2)-1-o(1); an o(1) term has no fixed sign, so both forms give an exponent tending to sqrt(2)-1. Theorem 3 extends Krückeberg's Sidon-set result to perfect difference sets, producing one with limsup A(x)/sqrt(x) >= 1/sqrt(2), better than the 1/sqrt(6) that a direct application of Theorem 1 would give. Section 4 poses three open problems; Problem 1 (p. 9) asks whether some perfect difference set has t_n = o(n^3), where t_n is the smaller member of the unique representation of n as a difference, and notes that Lev's greedy set has t_n << n^3.

Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0609244. The copy read for this card is the arXiv preprint (v1, 8 September 2006). The arXiv record carries no license field, so arXiv's assumed license applies (arXiv:math/0609244), every other right reserved.

Results. Labels and pages are those of the arXiv preprint named above.

  • Theorem 1 (p. 2): for every Sidon set B and every omega(x) tending to infinity there is a perfect difference set A of positive integers with A(x) >= B(x/3) - omega(x).
  • Theorem 2 (p. 2): there is a perfect difference set A of positive integers with A(x) >> x^{sqrt(2)-1+o(1)}, answering Lev's question with an exponent above 1/3.
  • Theorem 3 (p. 2): there is a perfect difference set A with limsup A(x)/sqrt(x) >= 1/sqrt(2).
  • Problem 1 (p. 9): whether some perfect difference set has t_n = o(n^3); the paper leaves it open.

Read status. Claims checked for the four results above, read clause by clause on the print; the proofs of Theorems 1 and 3 were read for their structure only.

Bears on.

  • Problem 1194: the sets of Problem 1194, in which every n >= 1 is uniquely a_n - b_n, are the perfect difference sets of positive integers. For such a set the paper's t_n is b_n, so t_n = o(n^3) exactly when a_n = o(n^3), that is a_n/n = o(n^2). Read with the abstract's definition of a perfect difference set as a set of positive integers (p. 1), the paper's Problem 1 asks whether some such set has a_n/n = o(n^2); its introduction allows any set of integers. The paper poses this question and does not answer it. Theorems 1 to 3 construct such sets with large counting functions and give no bound on a_n/n.

No file of this source is held: no license on record permits its redistribution, and the card cites the edition it names above.