Status
On this page
Status
Topics
Status
On this page
Status
Topics
Let and count the number of distinct prime factors of . Are there infinitely many values of such that
for all which are sufficiently large depending on only?
Can one show the stronger version with
is false?
Source: erdosproblems.com/679
No claim settles this problem.
Open, the site's label (page last edited 17 April 2026). The
site's remarks credit the forum user DottedCalculator with disproving the
stronger version, the second question, and record Lau's unconditional bound;
the standing in the frontmatter derives from the claim pages under the parts
epsilon_version and stronger_version: the second question has the pending
partial claim on
DottedCalculator's page,
and the first has only the conditional result on
Lau's page, so
the problem stays open.