Status
On this page
Status
Topics
Status
On this page
Status
Topics
Let and . Is
irrational?
Source: erdosproblems.com/252
An accepted solution exists. The statement is true.
Open on the site: the site labels the problem OPEN (page last
edited 2026-01-22), the community database and
formal-conjectures list it open, and nobody outside this repository had
examined or acknowledged a proof by that date. The frontmatter standing
solved, proved derives from the
claim page (Tokengrinder, 2026) of
a kernel-checked Lean 4 proof published anonymously in September 2026, which
answers yes for every (and covers ); its only acceptance evidence
is formalized: the proof was rebuilt and kernel-replayed here and its whole
statement was found faithful by a graded fresh-context review, the third-round
fidelity
review of 2026-09-18 and its
distinct
grade, which docs/anatomy.md counts as documented independent acceptance
of the external result; the Current assessment states what the two earlier
review rounds found and why their grades warrant nothing. There is no
refereed write-up, and the mechanical facts trust Lean's kernel and the
consistency of Mathlib v4.33.1. Refereed work settles
unconditionally (Erdős,
Erdős–Straus
and Erdős–Kac for ; Schlage-Puchta 2006 and Friedlander–Luca–Stoiciu
2007 for ; Pratt, Acta Arith. 211 (2023) for ) and every under
Schinzel's Hypothesis H or Dickson's conjecture; each of these results has an
accepted partial or conditional claim page, listed under Known Results.