Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Source. Aron Bhalla, A conditional note on an Erdős problem on large prime factors of polynomial products, Lemma 2.1, physical pp. 2--3, in the five-page PDF held by its library source card, Bhalla (2026).
Standing. This is an author-recorded reconstruction of the displayed conditional route. It is not an independent review and does not change Problem 976's status or assign a verification tier. The standard Gauss lemma cited by the source is used as an external algebraic input for the final irreducibility transfer; its cited book was not reread here.
Statement
Let be irreducible of degree . Replace by if necessary so that its leading coefficient is positive. Define
Then there are integers and a polynomial such that
and is irreducible in , has degree , has positive leading coefficient, and has no prime divisor common to all of its values.
Reconstruction
Since is irreducible and has degree at least two, it has no integer root. Thus every is nonzero and is a positive integer. If , take , , and ; all assertions are immediate. Assume from now on that and write
For each , the integer is the minimum of the nonnegative integers . Choose an integer with
The moduli are pairwise coprime. The Chinese remainder theorem therefore gives an integer satisfying
Set
and replace by its representative with . Then and , the latter because divides every value of .
Define the polynomial identity
It remains to establish that this quotient has the claimed integral and irreducible structure.
Integrality, degree, and sign
For an integer polynomial , every nonconstant coefficient of is divisible by . Hence
Because and , every coefficient of is divisible by . Thus . If is the leading coefficient of , then has degree and leading coefficient
No fixed prime divisor
First let . Polynomial evaluation preserves congruences modulo , so
The right side has -adic valuation exactly . The congruence therefore gives , and hence
So no prime dividing divides every value of .
Now let be a prime with . If divided for every , then the identity would imply
Every prime divisor of divides , so . The progression therefore runs through every residue class modulo . It follows that for every integer , which would imply , a contradiction. Thus no prime divides all values of .
Irreducibility
The substitution is an automorphism of , with inverse . It preserves irreducibility, so is irreducible over . Dividing by the nonzero constant does not change irreducibility over , and therefore is irreducible over .
If a prime divided every coefficient of , it would divide every value , contrary to the preceding paragraph. Thus is primitive. Gauss's lemma, the standard result cited in the source, transfers its irreducibility to irreducibility in .
This proves all six parts of Lemma 2.1. The construction depends only on the fixed polynomial and is independent of the later endpoint .
Boundary. No prime-value assertion is used in this lemma. The retained source's citation to S. Lang, Algebra, revised third edition, Chapter IV, is the external source boundary for Gauss's lemma. The next page supplies the separate prime-values hypothesis and its conditional application.