Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Weighted symmetrization at triangle vertices
This page preserves an earlier research route and its local standing. The completed threshold proof is in the solution note.
The following lemma bounds the mass of vertices belonging to triangles; obtaining a color-count bound requires an additional argument.
Consider a finite graph template with nonnegative vertex weights summing to one. An ordinary edge contributes to its density ; a loop contributes . Loops represent clique bags in a blow-up. Let be the set of types occurring in a triangle in the blow-up sense (equivalently, in a closed three-step walk of the template), and write .
If , then
The same bound applies to an ordinary graph with and the proportion of its vertices belonging to triangles, by assigning every vertex weight .
Proof
Let . No vertex of has a loop, and no triangle meets . Symmetrize only the weights on , keeping the weights on fixed. If two positive-weight vertices are nonadjacent, move all the weight of the smaller weighted-degree vertex to the larger one and delete the emptied type. The edge density does not decrease: it is affine in this transfer, because have no loops and is absent. No triangle meeting a surviving -type is created, because the support graph only loses a vertex. The total weight in is preserved.
After finitely many transfers, the surviving positive-weight -types form a clique. There are at most two of them, since three would be a triangle. Denote their weights by , permitting . Their neighborhoods within are independent, and disjoint when both types survive. In the one-type case put . Write
The symmetrized graph, and hence the original graph, satisfies
If , the last expression is at most , a contradiction. If , its maximum over is , obtained at . This proves (1).
Sharp weighted example
For any , take five parts with
Put in the four-cycle , make a clique bag, and join to . Add no other edges. Exactly the types in are triangular, and direct counting gives .
Why this does not finish the color problem
The lemma identifies a large set of triangular vertices, but does not make its incident edges pairwise -compatible. The three-branch construction has repeated colors on edges incident to different triangular wing cliques. A lower bound on the number of triangular vertices cannot be substituted for the missing color-count argument.