Standing. Author-recorded reconstruction of a claimed result (see
the Lemma 3.1 page for
the note's standing); not an independent review; changes no status and
assigns no tier. Imported inputs: the prime number theorem in the form
π(2Q)−π(Q)∼Q/logQ as Q→∞, of which only the lower bound
π(2Q)−π(Q)≫Q/logQ is consumed; Hölder's inequality; and the
inequality (a+b)α≤aα+bα for a,b≥0, 0<α≤1.
Definitions
c0=14/log2, all logarithms being natural (the note fixes this at the end
of its Section 1, physical p. 2), so that 14/c0=log2. For integers k≥3,
ω(n) is the number of distinct prime factors of n; D(n), Md(X)
and the representation (3.2) are as on
the Lemma 3.2 page.
For a finite set J of primes, aJ=∏p∈Jp. All O, ≪ and
o constants below are absolute.
Statement
For every sufficiently large k, every odd prime p∗, and every positive
odd squarefree integer V with ω(V)=k and all prime factors at most
2Q(k), there is an odd squarefree integer A>1 with
(A,p∗V)=1,ω(A)=t(k),
all prime factors of A in (Q(k),2Q(k)], and every residue modulo A
represented as in (3.2) with z0,…,z3∈D(V). The threshold for k
does not depend on p∗ or V.
Proof
Write u=logk, Q=Q(k) and t=t(k); k is large, so t≥1 and
t≤klog2/(7u).
The divisor sets. Split the prime factors of V into two disjoint sets of
sizes ⌊k/2⌋ and ⌈k/2⌉, and let V1,V2 be
their products; then V1,V2 are coprime, odd and squarefree with
V=V1V2. With Xi=D(Vi) and X=D(V),
∣X1∣=2⌊k/2⌋,∣X2∣=2⌈k/2⌉,∣X∣=2k,
so ∣Xi∣−1≤2⋅2−k/2.
The prime pool. Let P be the set of primes in (Q,2Q] that
divide neither V nor p∗. The prime number theorem gives
π(2Q)−π(Q)∼Q/logQ, and logQ=6u+logu∼6u, so, since at
most k+1 primes are excluded,
∣P∣∼logQQ∼6k6,
uniformly in V and p∗. Every element of P is an odd prime
exceeding Q.
Few primes of the pool divide a difference. Every element of X1, X2
or X lies in [1,V], so a nonzero difference δ of two elements of
one of these sets has 0<∣δ∣<V. If r distinct primes of
P divide δ then Qr<∣δ∣<V, so
r<logV/logQ. Hence at most
R=⌊logQlogV⌋≤logQklog(2Q)≤2k
primes of P divide δ, using logV≤klog(2Q), as V
has k prime factors each at most 2Q. Put ρ=R/∣P∣; then
ρ≪k−5, uniformly.
Random subsets. For 1≤s≤t let J be a uniformly random
s-element subset of P. For a fixed nonzero difference δ,
aJ∣δ if and only if every prime of J divides δ, and at
most R primes of P do, so
Pr(aJ∣δ)≤(sR)/(s∣P∣)=i=0∏s−1∣P∣−iR−i≤ρs.
For Y∈{X1,X2,X}, MaJ(Y) is ∣Y∣−2 times the number of pairs
(x,y)∈Y2 with aJ∣x−y; the ∣Y∣ diagonal pairs always count, and
each of the other pairs counts with probability at most ρs. Taking
expectations,
The random modulus. Let I be a uniformly random t-element subset of
P and A=aI; then A is odd, squarefree, coprime to p∗V,
with ω(A)=t and all prime factors in (Q,2Q]. Its divisors d>1 are
the aJ with ∅=J⊆I, and with w=(2Q)2/3 one has
aJ2/3≤w∣J∣. Let S be the sum (3.1) of Lemma 3.2 for this A
and the sets X1,X2,X. A uniformly random s-subset of a uniformly random
t-subset of P is a uniformly random s-subset of P,
and I has (st) subsets of size s, so
whose expansion has the four terms 2−2k/3, 2−k/3ρs/3,
2−k/3ρ2s/3 and ρs. Summing each against (st)ws by
the binomial theorem (adding the s=0 term where it helps, and subtracting
it in the last),
All four terms tend to zero. Here w=22/3k4u2/3, so
log(1+w)=4u+32logu+O(1), and ρ≪k−5 gives
log(1+wρ1/3)≤37u+32logu+O(1) and
log(1+wρ2/3)≤32u+32logu+O(1). Write
τ=klog2/(7u+3logu), so t≤τ.
which tends to −∞ because τ→∞ and
−31logu+O(1)→−∞.
For the fourth term, twρ≤τwρ≪(k/u)k4u2/3k−5=u−1/3,
so (1+wρ)t−1≤etwρ−1=O(u−1/3)=o(1).
All estimates depend on k alone. Hence EIS<1 once k exceeds
an absolute threshold, so some I has S<1, and Lemma 3.2 applied to
A=aI with V1,V2 gives the representation (3.2) of every residue
modulo A.
Qualifications
The prime number theorem is used only through the lower bound
∣P∣≫Q/logQ≍k6, hence ρ≪k−5, which
Chebyshev-type estimates also supply; the bound twρ≪u−1/3 on
the fourth term uses ρ≪k−5 in full, and a prime count weaker
by a factor u1/3 or more would not close it. The note cites the
theorem itself.
The note writes ∣X1∣,∣X2∣≍2k/2; the exact values are
recorded above and give the same bound.