Source. S. Korsky, A resolution of the de Bruijn--Erdős
consecutive-gap problem, arXiv:2609.07196v2, Section 6, displays
(6.4)--(6.6) and Lemma 6.2 (pp. 10--12) of the retained PDF, read in the
canonical conversion and checked against the text layer at the displayed
constants; held by its library card,
Korsky 2026, resolution.
The span input is
Lemma 6.1.
Standing. Author-recorded reconstruction; not an independent review;
changes no status and assigns no tier. The source is an unrefereed
preprint. The source's sentence about moving one atom is expanded into the
explicit remainder function Ru below.
Definitions
Notation as on the
Lemma 2.1 page and
the Lemma 6.1 page:
Pt, Nt(⋅), the moves Fs and Bs by kr places, the
distances Lt,k(p), and hypothesis (6.1) with its constant A≥1.
For D≥0 put
Identity (6.4). At an integer time n, each of the n points lies in
(x,x+D/n] for a set of x of measure D/n, so
∫TNn((x,x+D/n])dx=D and Δn(⋅,D) has mean
zero; its positive and negative parts have equal integrals, and
∫TΔn(x,D)dx=2Zn(D).(6.4)
Statement (Lemma 6.2, p. 11)
Assume (6.1). Fix D,E>0 and an integer k≥1, and put q=E/(kr). If
q<1, then for all sufficiently large t,
Zt(D)≤E(1+q)DZ(1+q)t(E)+qD+8kA+t4kr.(6.5)
Proof
Put t+=(1+q)t and ℓ=E/t+. For 0≤u≤ℓ choose s=s(u)
with kr/t−kr/s=u; as on the Lemma 2.1 page, t≤s≤t+. Let
Tu:PtFtPt↪PsBsPs↪Pt+
be the injection of the Lemma 2.1 proof, and write, with compatible lifts
to R,
Tu(p)=p+u+ηu(p).
The transport error (6.6). With p′=Ft(p) and p′′=Bs(p′) we have
Ft(p)=p+Lt,k(p) and p′=p′′+Ls,k(p′′), so
Tu(p)=p′′=p+Lt,k(p)−Ls,k(p′′) and, using kr/t−kr/s=u,
ηu(p)=(Lt,k(p)−tkr)−(Ls,k(p′′)−skr).
Lemma 6.1 at time t bounds the sum over p∈Pt of the first
term's absolute value by 2kA+kr/t. The map p↦p′′=Bs(Ft(p)) is
injective into Ps, so the sum over p∈Pt of the second term's
absolute value is at most the full sum over Ps, which Lemma 6.1 at
time s bounds by 2kA+kr/s≤2kA+kr/t. Hence
p∈Pt∑∣ηu(p)∣≤4kA+t2kr,(6.6)
uniformly for 0≤u≤ℓ.
Moving one atom. For a point y and the interval Ix=(x,x+D/t],
the function x↦1[y∈Ix+u] is the indicator of an
interval of x-values of length D/t ending at y−u. Moving y by a
circular distance ∣η∣ translates this interval by ∣η∣, so the
two indicators differ on a set of measure at most 2∣η∣. Define
Ru(x)=p∈Pt∑1[p+u∈Ix+u]−1[Tu(p)∈Ix+u]≥0;
then ∫TRu(x)dx≤∑p2∣ηu(p)∣≤8kA+4kr/t by
(6.6). Since Nt(Ix)=∑p∈Pt1[p+u∈Ix+u] and, by the
injectivity of Tu into Pt+,
Nt+(Ix+u)≥∑p∈Pt1[Tu(p)∈Ix+u], we get
Nt(Ix)≤Nt+(Ix+u)+Ru(x)(x∈T,0≤u≤ℓ).
Averaging in u. Average over 0≤u≤ℓ and put
R(x)=ℓ−1∫0ℓRu(x)du≥0, so that by Fubini
∫TR≤8kA+4kr/t. The same exchange of integrations as on
the Lemma 2.1 page gives
because ℓ=E/t+ makes (v,v+ℓ] an interval of length E/t+.
The constant part is ∣Ix∣E/ℓ=(D/t)t+=(1+q)D. Therefore
Δt(x,D)=Nt(Ix)−D≤qD+ℓ1∫IxΔt+(v,E)dv+R(x).
Positive parts. Since qD≥0, R≥0, (a+b+c)+≤a++b++c+
and (∫f)+≤∫f+,
(Δt(x,D))+≤qD+ℓ1∫Ix(Δt+(v,E))+dv+R(x).
Integrate over x∈T. Each v lies in Ix for a set of x of
measure ∣Ix∣=D/t, so the middle term integrates to
(∣Ix∣/ℓ)Zt+(E)=E(1+q)DZt+(E), and
Zt(D)≤qD+E(1+q)DZ(1+q)t(E)+8kA+t4kr,
which is (6.5). The times used are t, the s(u)∈[t,t+] and t+;
"sufficiently large t" means that (6.1) holds at their integer parts,
kr<∣Pt∣, and the intervals are shorter than 1.
Role in the argument
Iterated along doubling scales from r down to Ar, with the
terminal estimate of
Lemma 6.3, this
gives the short-interval L1 bound of
Proposition 6.4.
Only the upper comparison is needed: by (6.4) the positive mass controls
the full L1 norm at integer times.