Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Claim. For integers there are integers with
with an absolute implied constant and for large enough for the iterated logarithms to make sense. In the notation of Problem 305 this is , which implies and answers the problem's question yes, independently of Yokota's earlier solution (its claim page), whose exponent of it lowers to . The statement is Theorem 1.5 of the paper, recorded with a proof sketch on the library's result page: a smooth common denominator splits into a remainder that becomes smooth after multiplication by and a fraction with denominator ; the paper's Lemma 4.1 represents suitable smooth fractions with denominators in an interval of fixed ratio, and two such representations, scaled by and by an integer , give the result; the scaled sets are disjoint by size when and, when , because is a prime not dividing .
Acceptance. Refereed: Liu, Y. P. and Sawhney, M., On further questions regarding unit fractions, Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 2026, no. 2, rnaf382, received 28 October 2025, accepted 23 December 2025, published online 14 January 2026 (the publisher's record). The arXiv preprint is v1 of 10 April 2024, the version the library's source card records; the published text has not been compared with it. Reviewed: the site's curator, Thomas Bloom, marks Problem 305 proved and records this bound by name in the problem's commentary, as the improvement of the bound of Yokota's paper, which the commentary credits with the solution. The theorem's full proof at its own parameters is not compiled in this corpus, and no independent review of it is recorded.
Formalization. The file src/latest/ErdosProblems/Erdos305.lean in
Boris Alexeev's lean-proofs collection at the pinned commit (the third
link) declares itself a Lean formalization of the affirmative resolution
of Problem 305, names Bleicher, Erdős, Yokota, Liu and Sawhney as its
informal authors and Codex, GPT-5.6 Sol (OpenAI Codex) as its formal
authors, and cites the arXiv preprint of this paper among its primary
references. Its theorem erdos_305 proves the problem's
statement, not Theorem 1.5's bound; its top file does
not single out this paper's argument or Yokota's. The corpus did not build
the file, so no formalized evidence is listed; the same link is on
Yokota's page.