Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Claim. M. Axenovich and F. C. Clemen, Rainbow subgraphs in edge-colored complete graphs: answering two questions by Erdős and Tuza, J. Graph Theory 106 (2024), no. 1, 57--66 (arXiv:2209.13867; page numbers below are those of v2). For a graph with edges they write when has an -coloring without a rainbow ; for this is a balanced coloring in the sense of Problem 811. The paper proves three exclusions.
- Theorem 3.3 (p. 5): "Let be an odd integer. For every integer and there is a completely balanced coloring of with colors without a rainbow , where ."
- Theorem 1.4 (p. 2), which follows from Theorem 3.3: for with or and , every carries a completely balanced -coloring of with no rainbow .
- Theorem 1.2 (p. 2): the set of with for infinitely many admissible has size , proved from their Lemma 4.1 (no perfect difference set of size in gives such colorings) and Peluse's count of the that have a perfect difference set, which the paper cites.
Covers. Outside the answer set: every clique with and (Theorem 1.4, since ); every graph with an odd number of edges that contains (Theorem 3.3); and all but of the clique sizes (Theorem 1.2). It does not cover the cases , which the remark after Theorem 1.4 announces without proof, and Theorem 1.6, which concerns colorings with colors, answers the Erdős--Tuza variant and not this problem. The paper's Conjecture 1.3, that every with is excluded, is not part of the claim.
Depends on. Nothing in this wiki; the results are the paper's own theorems, with Theorem 1.2 resting on Peluse's cited theorem.
Acceptance. Refereed: Journal of Graph Theory, volume 106 (2024), no. 1,
57--66. The site's commentary credits the paper with infinitely many graphs
lacking the property, but the site labels the problem OPEN, so no
reviewed evidence is listed.