Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Claim. There is an absolute constant such that
where is the least such that every red/blue coloring of has a red three-term or a blue -term arithmetic progression (Green states it with the colors exchanged, a blue three-term or a red -term progression; the colors are names). Equivalently, for large some two-coloring of keeps every blue progression below three terms and every red progression shorter than . The bound is superpolynomial in , the first such bound, and it refutes the conjecture , which Green (p. 2) attributes to Ahmed, Kullmann and Snevily, noting that Li and Shu posed proving or disproving as an open problem and that Green had also suggested a quadratic bound as plausible; Green writes of first hearing the question whether from Graham around 2004, and the site's commentary calls the refuted statement Graham's conjecture. The previous lower bounds were of order (Brown, Landman and Robertson) and (Li and Shu). The theorem is paged at Theorem 1.1 of the library's source card, whose locators are the published article's.
Covers. The lower-bound challenge of Problem 721, a non-trivial lower bound for , which the Formulation reads, as the site does, as a superpolynomial one. Hunter's improvement to has its own claim page, and the upper-bound challenge is met by Schoen on Schoen's claim page. The open-ended request for reasonable bounds is not covered: Green expects the truth to lie between the paper's bound and about , and the order of magnitude is open.
Depends on. Nothing in this wiki; the result is the paper's own theorem.
Acceptance. Reviewed: the site's curator, T. F. Bloom, labels the problem SOLVED and credits the superpolynomial lower bound to this paper in the problem's commentary (page last edited 4 April 2026, accessed 2026-09-18). Refereed: Forum of Mathematics, Pi 10 (2022), e18, 1--51, received 23 February 2021 and accepted 8 March 2022 (the article's first page); the published version records Hunter's improvement in a June 2022 update note. The arXiv preprint 2102.01543v1 of 2 February 2021 is the first posting and names this page.
Read depth. Claims checked: the basis is Theorem 1.1 (p. 2) and its equivalent Theorem 2.1 (p. 5), with the identity between the two forms of the bound checked on the problem page; the proof is not covered, and nothing is independently reviewed in this corpus.