Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Claim. For every fixed there are constants , depending only on , such that for every sufficiently large some graph of order and size has, in every -coloring of its edges, a color containing induced monochromatic cycles of every length between and (Theorem 10; its Lemma 9 supplies the graph for every large , and the introduction states it for every ); hence the induced size Ramsey number satisfies (Corollary 11), and in two colors . The abstract adds that this settles the conjecture of Graham and Rödl that the induced size-Ramsey number of the path of order is linear. Deleting a vertex of an induced monochromatic cycle leaves an induced monochromatic path, so in two colors too. The results are paged at Theorem 10 and Corollary 11 of the library's source card, whose page numbers are the authors' preprint's, not the journal's.
Scope. Full: all three questions of Problem 720. Since , (i) is answered no and (ii) yes. Since , (iii) is answered yes. The value is solved because one answer is no and the others yes. The paper proves no separate theorem about paths, though it quotes Beck's linear bound (p. 2) and says its main result settles Graham and Rödl's question whether a linear bound also holds for induced Ramsey numbers of paths (abstract; p. 2). Beck's earlier path bound has its own claim page, and the site credits Beck with the cycle bound too. This paper (p. 3) attributes the plain, non-induced linear bound for cycles to Bollobás, Burr and a third person the preprint leaves unnamed and the published abstract names as Reimer, as a personal communication of November 1992, and says its proof of Theorem 10 can be simplified to a direct proof of that bound; it is the first published proof of among the sources read. Explicit constants came later: Javadi, Khoeini, Omidi and Pokrovskiy give for large with for even and for odd (Combin. Probab. Comput. 28 (2019)), improving the with and of their 2017 preprint.
Depends on. Nothing in this wiki; the result is the paper's own theorem.
Dating. The page is dated by the issue month of the journal record (Combin. Probab. Comput. 4 (1995), no. 3, September 1995, per the Crossref record); the day in the page name is a placeholder.
Acceptance. Refereed: Combin. Probab. Comput. 4 (1995), no. 3, 217--239. Semantic Scholar's roughly 95 citing records (titles, 2026-09-18) include no dispute. The site's commentary does not cite the paper; it credits the cycle bound to Beck.
Read depth. Claims checked: the basis is Theorem 10 and Corollary 11 (preprint p. 11) and the attribution (p. 3 and reference [6], p. 21); no proof is covered, and nothing is independently reviewed in this corpus. The journal text is not compared with the preprint.