Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Claim. Some graph with no K4K_4 on fewer than 7.02⋅10117.02\cdot10^{11} vertices has a monochromatic triangle in every 22-coloring of its edges, which answers Problem 582 yes with the first concrete bound on the least order Fe(3,3;4)F_e(3,3;4). The bound is stated as Lange, Radziszowski and Xu report it in the text of their history of Fe(3,3;4)F_e(3,3;4) (arXiv:1207.3750v2, Section 2: Frankl and Rödl "showed that Fe(3,3;4)<7.02×1011F_e(3,3;4)<7.02\times10^{11}"); their Table 1 lists 8×10118\times10^{11}, Lu (SIAM J. Discrete Math. 21 (2008), p. 1053) writes f(2,3,4)≤7×1011f(2,3,4)\le7\times10^{11}, and the site writes 7⋅10117\cdot10^{11}. Radziszowski and Xu (their survey) count the proof among the probabilistic ones: a random graph with one edge removed from each K4K_4 is shown to arrow (3,3)(3,3) with positive probability. The paper, whose title concerns large triangle-free subgraphs in graphs without K4K_4, is not held; the statement is taken from these accounts of it.

Depends on. Nothing in this wiki.

Acceptance. Refereed: P. Frankl and V. Rödl, Large triangle-free subgraphs in graphs without K4K_4, Graphs and Combinatorics 2 (1986), no. 1, 135--144 (December 1986 by its Crossref record; the day is a placeholder). The site's label rests on Folkman's existence proof, so the site's commentary crediting Frankl and Rödl is not listed as evidence.