Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Claim. Let and let be primes. Every interval of more than consecutive integers contains at least distinct integers divisible by at least one . For every there are primes and an interval of length containing exactly such integers. In the notation of Problem 1143: for every and every choice of primes, , and for the primes of the construction with equality holds, since every subinterval of length of the constructed interval contains at most such integers and, being longer than , at least . The least value of over all sets of primes is therefore exactly throughout . Erdős calls the result "complete and best possible as it stands" (1978, p. 36).
Covers. The range of the statement's , for a perfect square: the extremal value of over all choices of the primes is , and it is attained for every such by one choice of primes. The range , which the statement also asks about, is not covered: Erdős writes that next to nothing is known for intervals longer than and asks whether, for every and , some primes and an interval of length more than hold fewer than distinct multiples (1978, p. 36).
Source. P. Erdős, Problems and results in combinatorial analysis and combinatorial number theory, Proceedings of the Ninth Southeastern Conference on Combinatorics, Graph Theory, and Computing (Boca Raton, 1978), Congressus Numerantium XXI, Utilitas Math., Winnipeg, 1978, 29--40; Section 6, "Work with Ulam and Selfridge": the problem is set on printed p. 35 (intervals of length , the trivial cases excluded), Theorem 1 with the sharpness statement on p. 36, the sharpness proof on pp. 36--37 and the main proof from p. 37, through a lemma giving translates of a -tuple of primes and the Chinese remainder theorem. Erdős writes the primes as with , so primes; this page renumbers them with as the statement does. The paper is single-authored and presents the theorem as joint work ("my joint work with Selfridge", p. 35); Erdős's later paper, Some problems on number theory, Analytic and elementary number theory (Marseille, 1983), Publ. Math. Orsay 86-1 (1986), 53--67, attributes the theorem to "Selfridge and I" and reprints the proof in full (pp. 60--61), so the claimants are Erdős and Selfridge. The library's card is erdos_1978_problems_results_combinatorial_analysis_combinatorial_number. The 1978 proceedings carry no finer date than the year, by which this page is named.
The site's account. The site's commentary reports from [Va99] that Erdős and Selfridge found the exact bound for and gives no reference. A thread comment of 2026-04-26 pointed to the two papers above, and the curator, Thomas Bloom, wrote on 2026-04-29 that the paper of Green and Ruzsa on the arithmetic Kakeya conjecture cites the earlier work of Erdős and Selfridge, which identifies what [Va99] refers to.
Acceptance. None listed. The paper appeared in a proceedings volume with no evidence on record that it was refereed, and the site labels the problem OPEN, so the curator's commentary is not acceptance of a result on it. This corpus has not checked the proof.
Depends on. No page of this wiki; the result rests on the cited papers.