Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Claim. Both clauses of the corrected Statement of Problem 49 hold. Let be the largest size of a set of positive integers up to with . Theorem 1.1 of T. Tao, Monotone Nondecreasing Sequences of the Euler Totient Function, states: "We have for all ", and, by the prime number theorem, in the form (1.2),
the lower bound coming from the primes, on which increases. A set on which is strictly increasing is in particular one on which it is nondecreasing, so every strict example has , and since , also (the strict transfer). This answers both clauses of the corrected Statement; it does not decide Erdős's exact conjecture, recorded on the problem page, that the primes are a largest strict example.
Covers. Both clauses of the corrected Statement: every strict example has , and so . Erdős's exact conjecture, that the primes are a largest strict example, is not part of the corrected Statement and is not covered.
Depends on. The strict transfer, the passage from Tao's nondecreasing maximum to strict examples.
Acceptance. Reviewed: the site's curator, Thomas F. Bloom, independent of the author, labels the problem PROVED (LEAN) and credits the bound to this paper [Ta24d]; the source digest compiles the complete proof chain. Refereed publication: La Matematica 3(2) (2024), 793–820, doi:10.1007/s44007-024-00115-z, received 10 September 2023, accepted 30 April 2024, published online 23 May 2024. The page is dated by the first arXiv posting, arXiv:2309.02325 v1 of 5 September 2023.
Formalization. The file src/latest/ErdosProblems/Erdos49.lean of Boris
Alexeev's lean-proofs repository, linked above at its main-branch commit of
4 September 2026, declares itself a Lean formalization of a solution to Erdős
Problem 49 with Terence Tao as informal author and Codex and GPT-5.6 Sol as
formal authors. It states erdos_49, the strict clause, and
erdos_49_quantitative, Tao's nondecreasing bound with its rate; neither
asserts that the primes are a largest strict example. This corpus has not
built or audited the development, so the page lists no formalized
evidence.