Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Claim. P. Erdős and E. G. Straus, Some number theoretic results, Pacific J. Math. 36 (1971), no. 3, 635--646, prove two results on the series
of Problem 258, where
is the number of divisors of . Theorem 2.23 (printed p. 641) states that
the series is irrational whenever is a monotonic
sequence of integers; its proof joins two cases, Lemma 2.2 (some
has for infinitely many ) and
Lemma 2.14, whose proof uses the Dirichlet divisor theorem
, the almost-all bound
, and Lemma 2.17, which bounds
for almost all and every . Lemma 2.14 (printed p. 640)
states that if for all , with some constant
, then the series is irrational, and the paper adds that in this lemma
"we need not assume the monotonicity of " (p. 640), nor even that the
are positive, the proof being written for positive . The
section's Conjecture 2.24 (printed p. 642) states the problem's question,
irrationality for every sequence with , which
Chojecki's deduction
answers. The paper's Theorem 2.26 proves the analogous irrationality for
and in place of for monotonic integer
sequences with for large , the subject of the further
conjecture the site's remarks record. The source card
erdos_1971_number_theoretic_results
names the author-archive scan (the second paper link) as the copy read; no
file is held.
Covers. Two classes of sequences: every nondecreasing integer sequence with (Theorem 2.23), whether or not it tends to infinity, and every sequence of positive integers with for all and some (Lemma 2.14), with no monotonicity. Not covered: sequences tending to infinity that are neither monotone nor bounded below by such a power of , which is the gap the problem's question concerns.
Acceptance. Refereed: the Pacific Journal of Mathematics, volume 36,
issue 3 (March 1971), pp. 635--646; the Crossref record of the DOI gives
these data. The site labels the problem PROVED (LEAN) and credits Chojecki
with the full answer; its remark that Erdős and Straus proved the monotone
case credits this paper with a part only, so no reviewed evidence is
listed. The proofs are not checked here.
Depends on. Nothing in this wiki.