Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Claim. J. Lambek and L. Moser, On integers nn relatively prime to f(n)f(n), Canad. J. Math. 7 (1955), 155--158. Let Q(x)Q(x) count the n≤xn\le x with (n,f(n))=1(n,f(n))=1. Theorem 1: if ff is non-decreasing and f∗(n)f^*(n), the number of mm with f(m)=nf(m)=n, is finite and non-decreasing, then

Q(x)=6π−2x+O(f(x)log⁡f(x))+O(f∗(f(x))log⁡f(x))+O(xf(x)−1).Q(x)=6\pi^{-2}x+O(f(x)\log f(x))+O(f^*(f(x))\log f(x))+O(xf(x)^{-1}).

Theorem 2 gives density 6π−26\pi^{-2} when also f(x)log⁡f(x)=o(x)f(x)\log f(x)=o(x) and f∗(f(x))log⁡f(x)=o(x)f^*(f(x))\log f(x)=o(x). Example 1 and its extension: for f(x)=⌊x1/k⌋f(x)=\lfloor x^{1/k}\rfloor with k>1k>1 an integer, Q(x)=6π−2x+O(x1−1/klog⁡x)Q(x)=6\pi^{-2}x+O(x^{1-1/k}\log x).

Covers. The exponents α=1/k\alpha=1/k for integers k≥2k\ge2 of Problem 1149, not all 0<α<10<\alpha<1. Bergelson and Richter credit the paper with every 0<α<10<\alpha<1, but the paper states only α=1/k\alpha=1/k. Its Theorem 2 does not reach other exponents as stated, because the number of nn with ⌊nα⌋=m\lfloor n^\alpha\rfloor=m need not be non-decreasing in mm (for α=2/3\alpha=2/3 it is 2,3,22,3,2 at m=1,2,3m=1,2,3). The full statement is Delmer and Deshouillers's.

Depends on. No page of this wiki.

Acceptance. Refereed: Canadian Journal of Mathematics 7 (1955). The page name's date is the publication year; the day is unknown.