Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Claim. Let be the integers in coprime to . For every ,
and the case is the bound the problem asks for, so the answer is yes. The source is H. L. Montgomery and R. C. Vaughan, On the distribution of reduced residues, Ann. of Math. (2) 123 (1986), no. 2, 311--333, DOI 10.2307/1971274. The page is dated to the issue month, March 1986, as the Crossref record gives it; the day is not recorded, and the page name uses the first of the month.
Acceptance. Refereed: the paper appeared in the Annals of Mathematics. Reviewed: Thomas Bloom, the site's curator, independent of the claimants, labels the problem PROVED (LEAN), last edited 8 December 2025, and the commentary attributes the positive answer to this paper and states the general form, read from the dated snapshot of 2026-09-05, when the thread held three comments and the proof-claim tab was empty. Guy's collection, Section B40, records Erdős's conjecture, Erdős's offer for it and that Montgomery and Vaughan won the prize (card). The paper is not held and was not read in this repository; this page rests on no review of its own.
Formalization. The file src/latest/ErdosProblems/Erdos220.lean of
Boris Alexeev's public repository plby/lean-proofs (added 2026-08-17; the
formalization link above pins the main head of 2026-09-15) describes
itself as a Lean formalization of a solution to Problem 220, naming Hugh
Montgomery and Robert Vaughan as the informal authors and Codex and
GPT-5.6 Sol as the formal authors. It defines sumSquaredGaps on lists
and sortedTotatives n, the increasing list of the coprime to
, and proves erdos_220: there is such that for every the
sum of the squared gaps of sortedTotatives n is at most ,
the question's bound with made one absolute constant; the file
prints the theorem's axioms. formal-conjectures added its statement file
220.lean on 2026-09-19, marked research solved with a formal_proof
pointer to that file at the same commit, and the community database
records the statement formalized since 2026-09-19 and the formal status
Lean as of that field's last update on 2026-08-24, without recording when that
state was set, which is the site's LEAN suffix. The file was read
as text and neither built nor audited by the corpus, so it gives no
formalized evidence: the registrations record that a Lean proof exists,
not an examination of its statement's fidelity to the problem.
Scope. Full. The site's thread discusses stronger asymptotic forms of the bound; they are not part of this claim.