Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Claim. Xiyu Hu's manuscript "A Super-Square-Root Lower Bound for Factorial Residues Modulo a Prime" (in the author's GitHub repository, published 2026-07-23; the link pins the revision of the same day) proves that, for as in Problem 478,
The elementary bound is , since every nonzero residue is a quotient of two factorials, and the best published constant is ([GSSV24], carded at Grebennikov, Sagdeev, Semchankau and Vasilevskii 2024). The argument uses three consecutive factorials: in one has , so with the factorial sequence supplies at least transitions with , and in . After Cauchy–Schwarz the compositions are affine maps; a multiplicity-two count bounds the repeated lines, and the point-line incidence bound of Stevens and de Zeeuw for Cartesian products (Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. 49 (2017); arXiv:1609.06284) gives the exponent .
Submission note. Posted to erdosproblems.com as a proof claim by Xiyu Hu (account hxypqr) on 23 July 2026, giving "GPT-5.6 Sol" as the AI used:
For a prime , let
I prove the lower
bound
Thus the exponent goes strictly beyond the
elementary square-root bound. This does not resolve the original Erdős problem: in particular, it does not prove positive density or the conjectured asymptotic
The main idea is to use three consecutive
factorials and the identity
in
. Defining
the factorial sequence
supplies at least transitions inside . After applying Cauchy--Schwarz, the compositions become affine lines. Then a multiplicity-two calculation, together with a incidence geometry result, the Cartesian-product point-line incidence theorem of Stevens and de Zeeuw, then gives the exponent .
Covers. The lower bound . It does not prove that , nor the asymptotic the problem asks for; the manuscript, its repository and the claim's summary all say so.
Depends on. No page of this wiki.
Formalization. The repository's lean/ folder is a Lean 4 development
(Lean 4.29.0 with the matching Mathlib) whose theorem
factorialResidues_cleared_eight_fifteenths proves
from an explicit hypothesis named
StevensDeZeeuwWeightedCorollary, the published incidence theorem left
unformalized; the repository calls this a partial formalization, reports no
sorry and no project axiom, and documents under docs/ which steps are
checked and how the incidence theorem's hypotheses are met in the
application. This corpus has not built the development, so the link is a
formalization link and gives no formalized evidence.
Authorship and tools. Xiyu Hu is the manuscript's sole author and posted the claim. The repository's disclosure says that OpenAI's ChatGPT and Codex assisted with proof exploration, algebraic and literature checks, exposition, LaTeX preparation and the Lean development and are not authors; the forum entry names the system as GPT-5.6 Sol.
Standing. Posted on the problem's proof-claims tab as a partial claim on
2026-07-23 with the manuscript and the repository as its external links; the
entry carried no comments. The repository
says an arXiv submission is planned; none is recorded here. The manuscript is
not refereed and no outside reviewer has recorded accepting it, so the claim
is claimed. The site labels the problem OPEN (page last edited 12 April
2026) and its remarks do not mention the manuscript.