Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Claim. Let HH be a graph such that every prime induced subgraph H′H' of HH with at least three vertices has both a vertex of degree one and a vertex of degree ∣H′∣−2|H'|-2 (a graph is prime if it cannot be obtained by vertex substitution from two graphs with fewer vertices). Then HH has the Erdős–Hajnal property: there is c>0c>0 such that every HH-free graph GG has a clique or a stable set of size at least ∣G∣c|G|^c. This is Theorem 1.3 of T. Nguyen, A. Scott and P. Seymour, Induced subgraph density. IV. New graphs with the Erdős–Hajnal property, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. (2026), published online 2026-06-03, first posted as arXiv:2307.06455 on 2023-07-12 (the claim's date). Writing H\mathcal H for the class of such graphs, the paper shows that H\mathcal H contains a prime graph on hh vertices for every h≥4h\ge4, among them P4P_4 and the bull but neither C5C_5 nor P5P_5, so the theorem gives infinitely many prime HH and the first prime graphs with more than five vertices known to have the property. It is proved through the stronger Theorem 1.9, that every member of H\mathcal H is viral, and the paper's Theorem 1.10 extends it to pairs of excluded graphs from a wider class. The paper says that Chapter 3 of the first author's PhD thesis (Induced Subgraph Density, Princeton University, May 2025) proves the property for the family by a numerically simpler version of the argument; the site cites that thesis as a detailed account of the problem with proofs of some special cases, and the thread's post of 8 December 2025 lists the conjecture for infinitely many prime graphs among its contents. The thesis record is linked above.

Covers. Every HH in H\mathcal H: the instances of the question of Problem 61 for those HH, infinitely many of them prime. The problem stays open.

Depends on. Nothing in this wiki.

Acceptance. The paper is a refereed publication in the Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, which is the refereed evidence. The site's commentary credits the result through the thesis, but the site labels the problem OPEN, so no reviewed evidence is listed. This corpus has not checked the proof.