Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Claim. Write H(x,y,z)H(x,y,z) for the number of n≤xn\le x with a divisor in (y,z](y,z], Hr(x,y,z)H_r(x,y,z) for those with exactly rr such divisors, and ε(y,z)\varepsilon(y,z), εr(y,z)\varepsilon_r(y,z) for the limits of H/xH/x and Hr/xH_r/x. Ford's Corollary 2, at c=2c=2, gives the first answer asked by Problem 446:

δ(n)=ε(n,2n)≍1(log⁡n)α(log⁡log⁡n)3/2,α=1−1+log⁡log⁡2log⁡2=0.08607…,\delta(n)=\varepsilon(n,2n)\asymp\frac{1}{(\log n)^{\alpha}(\log\log n)^{3/2}}, \qquad \alpha=1-\frac{1+\log\log 2}{\log 2}=0.08607\ldots,

the order of magnitude of the density of integers with a divisor in (n,2n)(n,2n), with matching upper and lower bounds; this sharpens Erdős's 1960 estimate δ(n)=(log⁡n)−α+o(1)\delta(n)=(\log n)^{-\alpha+o(1)} and Tenenbaum's 1984 bounds, which match only up to slowly varying factors. For the second question, Theorem 4 gives H1(x,y,z)/H(x,y,z)≍log⁡log⁡(z/y+10)/log⁡(z/y+10)H_1(x,y,z)/H(x,y,z)\asymp\log\log(z/y+10)/\log(z/y+10) in a wide range, and Corollary 7 states the consequence for the densities: for every r≥1r\ge1 and λ>1\lambda>1,

εr(y,λy)ε(y,λy)≫r,λ1.\frac{\varepsilon_r(y,\lambda y)}{\varepsilon(y,\lambda y)}\gg_{r,\lambda}1 .

With r=1r=1 and λ=2\lambda=2 this is δ1(n)≫δ(n)\delta_1(n)\gg\delta(n), so δ1(n)=o(δ(n))\delta_1(n)=o(\delta(n)) is false; Ford states this as the refutation of his Conjecture 1, which he attributes to Erdős. The intervals are half-open, (y,2y](y,2y], where the problem writes (n,2n)(n,2n); the integers divisible by 2n2n itself have density 1/(2n)1/(2n), far below δ(n)\delta(n), so the orders are the same. The paper is filed as Ford 2008; the method combines sieve-style reductions of HH and HrH_r to averages of divisor-distribution functions with new bounds for uniform order statistics.

Both parts of the problem are settled by this one result: the growth rate is determined, and the second question is answered no. Ford proves more than the problem asks, εr(y,z)/ε(y,z)→0\varepsilon_r(y,z)/\varepsilon(y,z)\to0 whenever z/y→∞z/y\to\infty and the order of HrH_r for r≥2r\ge2 in most ranges.

Acceptance. Refereed: Ann. of Math. (2) 168 (2008), no. 2, 367–433. Reviewed: the site's curator, T. F. Bloom, marks Problem 446 solved and credits Ford for both the growth rate and the disproof. The page's date is the arXiv first posting, 2004-01-18. No formalization is recorded, and this repository has not checked the proof independently.