Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Claim. The answer to Problem 26 is no,
by a set with divergent reciprocal sum. The proof is a Lean 4 development by
the DeepMind prover agent in a fork of formal-conjectures, posted to the
site's thread by GTsoukalas on 2026-04-06 with an informal write-up and
merged into formal-conjectures the same day as the solution of
erdos_26.variants.tenenbaum, whose docstring there says that the DeepMind
prover agent found the formal disproof.
The construction. Fix an increasing sequence of primes with . The set is built in blocks. Block consists of the numbers for , where is the number of terms before the block, is divisible by for every , is chosen by the Chinese remainder theorem so that divides for the same , and is chosen so that the block's reciprocal sum lies between and . The reciprocal sum of the whole set therefore diverges, and for a shift every term of a block with has , so from some block on every shifted term is a multiple of the prime .
What the file proves. elementary_thick_sequence_exists gives a strictly
increasing with divergent reciprocal sum such
that for every the set of multiples of has lower density at most
; counterexample_exists derives from it that no shift is weakly
Behrend with ; and erdos_26.variants.tenenbaum concludes
that Tenenbaum's variant, that for every some shift makes the
multiples of reach lower density at least , is false.
The thread's write-up and the site's commentary state the stronger bound that
the multiples of every have upper density below , which the file
does not state. One further step, which the file does not state either,
settles the problem: a set of multiples of density one has lower density one,
so no is Behrend, and the answer to the question is no for this thick
set. The same set refutes the formal-conjectures statement erdos_26, which
restricts the question to sequences with divergent reciprocal sum and which
the formalization of Ruzsa's construction on
Ruzsa's claim page does
not prove.
Acceptance. None. This corpus has not built or audited the file, so no
formalized evidence is listed. The site's curator credits DeepMind for the
negative answer to Tenenbaum's variant only, and the site's label rests on the
earlier claims of
Davenport and Erdős
and Ruzsa, so nothing is reviewed; nothing is refereed.
Depends on. Nothing in this wiki.