Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Claim. On 2026-06-23 Kenta Kitamura (forum name KentaKitamura) posted in
the thread of Problem 176 a second Lean
4 development, for the displayed question . Its theorem
erdos176SqrtNumber_le_report_bound, with the README's compact form
Erdos176Lean.N176Sqrt_le_report_bound_explicit, states that for every
where the condition on a -term progression
is encoded as , so that the bound is and in
particular . The development reuses the infrastructure
of the author's formalization, and its README reports that
#print axioms lists only propext, Classical.choice and Quot.sound.
The post discloses that the formalization and comment were prepared with
assistance from Codex 5.5 using xhigh reasoning and ChatGPT 5.5 Pro.
Covers. The displayed question , answered yes with a polynomial bound. The result settles nothing for the question with or for the request for good upper bounds in general; the question has its own claim page.
Depends on. Nothing in this wiki.
Standing. Claimed. Zach Hunter wrote in the thread on 1 April 2026 that
Hunter and others had found an argument showing for some
; no note of that argument is known here, and a reply of 21 June 2026 to
the author's first development remarks that the reconstructed argument
generalizes to Hunter's bound. No comment on this development is recorded in
the thread. The site labels the problem OPEN and its commentary does not
record the bound, so no reviewed evidence is listed; nothing was built or
audited here, so no formalized evidence is listed.