Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Claim. T. D. Browning and D. R. Heath-Brown, Equal sums of three powers, Invent. Math. 157 (2004), no. 3, 553--573. Their Theorem bounds, for every d≥25d\ge25, the number of positive integer solutions of

x1d+x2d+x3d=x4d+x5d+x6dx_1^d+x_2^d+x_3^d=x_4^d+x_5^d+x_6^d

with max⁡xi≤B\max x_i\le B in which (x4,x5,x6)(x_4,x_5,x_6) is not a permutation of (x1,x2,x3)(x_1,x_2,x_3) (the paper calls the permutations the trivial solutions), and shows that these non-trivial solutions number o(B3)o(B^3) for every d≥33d\ge33. Their Corollary follows: with r(n)r(n) the number of triples (x1,x2,x3)∈N3(x_1,x_2,x_3)\in\mathbb N^3 with x1d+x2d+x3d=nx_1^d+x_2^d+x_3^d=n,

∑n≤xr(n)2∼6cx3/d,c=Γ(1+1/d)3Γ(1+3/d),\sum_{n\le x}r(n)^2\sim6cx^{3/d}, \qquad c=\frac{\Gamma(1+1/d)^3}{\Gamma(1+3/d)},

and for d≥33d\ge33 asymptotically 16cx3/d\tfrac16cx^{3/d} integers n≤xn\le x are sums of three ddth powers, almost all of them with essentially one representation. Whichever convention the paper's N\mathbb N follows, fk,3f_{k,3} in Problem 325 counts sums of three nonnegative kkth powers and so counts at least these integers, hence fk,3(x)≥(c/6+o(1))x3/kf_{k,3}(x)\ge(c/6+o(1))x^{3/k} for every k≥33k\ge33, and the answer to both forms of the question is yes for these kk.

Covers. Both forms of the question, fk,3(x)≫x3/kf_{k,3}(x)\gg x^{3/k} and fk,3(x)≫ϵx3/k−ϵf_{k,3}(x)\gg_\epsilon x^{3/k-\epsilon}, for every k≥33k\ge33. The paper does not treat 3≤k≤323\le k\le32; for k=3k=3 the problem page records Wooley's bound.

Depends on. No page of this wiki.

Acceptance. Refereed: Inventiones Mathematicae 157 (2004), no. 3, 553--573, the DOI linked above; the page is dated by the article's online publication date in the Crossref record, 17 March 2004. Not reviewed: the paper reached the problem's thread through two comments of 2026-03-09, the first of which credits ChatGPT Deep Research with locating it and quotes the Corollary, and the second of which gives the published reference. Comments on the thread are not curator credit, the site's commentary does not mention the paper, and the site labels the problem OPEN. The proof is not checked in this corpus.