Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Claim. For every positive function tending to , the set of for which
fails has asymptotic density ; in particular for almost all . This is Theorem 3(i) of Luca and Pomerance, On some problems of Mąkowski–Schinzel and Erdős concerning the arithmetical functions and , Colloq. Math. 92 (2002), no. 1, 111–130, digested on the card [[../library/arithmetic_functions/luca_2002_problems_makowski_schinzel_erdos/_index|Luca and Pomerance 2002]]; part (ii) of the same theorem shows that and differ by less than on a set of density one. After the theorem the authors remark that the method of their Theorem 2 shows the value set of to be dense in , so that for every the inequality holds for infinitely many ; they give no further details, and the remark is not a result of the paper. For the second inequality of the question, that for infinitely many , their introduction cites the infinite families of [[problems/arithmetic_functions/E1064/claims/2001_07_01_grytczuk_luca_wojtowicz|Grytczuk, Luca and Wójtowicz 2001]], which is where the corpus accepts it; the elementary family also gives it. The method is a sieve and normal-order study of the prime factorization of .
Covers. The first part of
Problem 1064
(almost_all): on a set of density one, with the
margin for any . The second part
(infinitely_often) is settled on the page of Grytczuk, Luca and Wójtowicz.
Depends on. No page of this wiki: the proof is self-contained in the paper.
Acceptance. Refereed: the paper appeared in Colloquium Mathematicum in
2002 (volume 92, issue 1; the issue carries no month, so the page's date is
the first day of the publication year). Reviewed: erdosproblems.com labels
the problem PROVED and credits the density-one statement, with the margin
, to this paper as [LuPo02] (page last edited 2025-10-06), which the
corpus counts as documented independent acceptance of this part by the
site's curator, T. F. Bloom (erdosproblems.com); the site's commentary also
describes the density remark as proved, which the paper does not support.
The community database lists the problem proved, with its statement
formalized and no formal proof. Formalization: the Lean file in Boris
Alexeev's lean-proofs repository, linked above at its pinned commit, declares
itself a formalization of Luca and Pomerance's solution, names Codex and
GPT-5.6 Sol as its formal authors, and proves the density-one statement
erdos_1064 without sorry, together with the infinitude variant and the
margin variant of the formal-conjectures file; the corpus has not built or
audited it, and no Lean that the corpus built and audited checks the
statement, so the evidence lists no formalized kind. The proof is not
compiled in this wiki; the standing rests on the refereeing and the site's
acceptance.