Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Claim. Let K(N)K(N) be the least tt such that every tt-element subset of {1,…,N}\{1,\ldots,N\} has a three-term arithmetic progression among its positive subset sums. Then for N>N0N>N_0

[log⁡Nlog⁡3]+2 ≤ K(N) < 1log⁡3(log⁡N+log⁡log⁡N)+2\Bigl[\frac{\log N}{\log3}\Bigr]+2\ \le\ K(N)\ <\ \frac1{\log3}(\log N+\log\log N)+2

(Theorem 4, printed p. 251). P. Erdős and A. Sárközy, Arithmetic progressions in subset sums, Discrete Math. 102 (1992), no. 3, 249--264, cited as [ErSa92] on the problem page. Library home erdos_sarkozy_1992_arithmetic_progressions_subset_sums; result page Theorem 4. The paper never writes gk(n)g_k(n). In the notation of Problem 817, an nn-element A⊆{1,…,N}A\subseteq\{1,\ldots,N\} whose subset sums avoid non-trivial three-term progressions gives K(N)≥n+1K(N)\ge n+1, so the upper half of the theorem yields g3(n)≫3n/ng_3(n)\gg3^n/n. The interval count in the proof (p. 261), with the factor 22 that the print omits restored, is that the 3n3^n distinct sums ∑εaa\sum\varepsilon_aa with εa∈{0,1,2}\varepsilon_a\in\{0,1,2\} lie in {0,1,…,2∑a∈Aa}⊆{0,1,…,2nN}\{0,1,\ldots,2\sum_{a\in A}a\}\subseteq\{0,1,\ldots,2nN\}; it gives the explicit g3(n)≥(3n−1)/(2n)g_3(n)\ge(3^n-1)/(2n) directly. The print counts the sums in {0,1,…,∣A∗∣N}\{0,1,\ldots,\lvert\mathcal A^*\rvert N\}, a slip: the corrected count gives the theorem's upper half only with NN replaced by 2N2N, and the theorem as printed holds for large NN by a second-moment count (an observation made here, recorded on the problem page). The result page records these translations, which are not statements of the paper. The site's commentary credits Erdős and Sárközy with g3(n)≫3n/nO(1)g_3(n)\gg3^n/n^{O(1)}, leaving the exponent unspecified; the paper's own argument gives exponent 11. The lower half of the theorem is the set of powers of three, the problem's g3(n)≤3n−1g_3(n)\le3^{n-1}. The paper asks (p. 252) whether K(N)=log⁡N/log⁡3+O(1)K(N)=\log N/\log3+O(1), which is the problem's displayed question g3(n)≫3ng_3(n)\gg3^n, and adds that it knows no NN with [log⁡N/log⁡3]+2<K(N)[\log N/\log3]+2<K(N).

Covers. The lower bound g3(n)≫3n/ng_3(n)\gg3^n/n, in the explicit form g3(n)≥(3n−1)/(2n)g_3(n)\ge(3^n-1)/(2n), read through K(N)K(N) as the result page records, and the upper bound g3(n)≤3n−1g_3(n)\le3^{n-1} from the powers of three. Not covered: the estimate of gk(n)g_k(n) for any kk, which stays open, and the displayed question g3(n)≫3ng_3(n)\gg3^n, which the paper poses and the pending claim of 2026 answers in the negative. The sharper lower bound (3/(2π)+o(1))3n/n(\sqrt3/(2\sqrt\pi)+o(1))3^n/\sqrt n is the pending claim of Korsky.

Depends on. No page of this wiki; the proof uses only the uniqueness of ternary expansion and counting.

Acceptance. Refereed: the paper is the publisher's version of record in Discrete Mathematics (Crossref record, as the problem page records; the record gives the issue month, May 1992, and no day, so this page is named by the first day of its year). The site's curator, Thomas F. Bloom, credits the bound to Erdős and Sárközy in the problem page's commentary, with the label OPEN; the problem is not marked settled there, so the credit is recorded here and is not listed as reviewed. The theorem and the remark that follows it are checked clause by clause and the proof of Theorem 4 followed step by step, with the slip in the count of p. 261 noted above; this is not an independent review.