Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Use the counting and probability notation. For every integer n≥1n\ge1,

Rn2n=P(Zn≤2−Hn)=P(Zn≥Hn−2).(1)\frac{R_n}{2^n} =\mathbb P(Z_n\le2-H_n) =\mathbb P(Z_n\ge H_n-2). \tag{1}

For every x>0x>0 and t>0t>0,

P(Zn≥t)≤e−xtEexZn=e−xt∏i=1ncosh⁡(x/i).(2)\mathbb P(Z_n\ge t) \le e^{-xt}\mathbb E e^{xZ_n} =e^{-xt}\prod_{i=1}^n\cosh(x/i). \tag{2}

The identity (1) holds even when Hn≤2H_n\le2. To use (2) with t=Hn−2t=H_n-2, we require Hn>2H_n>2, which holds for all sufficiently large nn.

Proof. Write δi=1i∈S=(1+εi)/2\delta_i=\mathbf1_{i\in S}=(1+\varepsilon_i)/2. Then

∑i=1nδii=Hn+Zn2.\sum_{i=1}^n\frac{\delta_i}{i} =\frac{H_n+Z_n}{2}.

Thus the reciprocal sum is at most one exactly when Zn≤2−HnZ_n\le2-H_n. The subset-to-sign map is a bijection. Each sign vector has probability 2−n2^{-n}. This proves the first equality in (1). The bijection (εi)↦(−εi)(\varepsilon_i)\mapsto(-\varepsilon_i) sends this event to Zn≥Hn−2Z_n\ge H_n-2, proving the second equality.

For a sign vector with Zn≥tZ_n\ge t, the number ex(Zn−t)e^{x(Z_n-t)} is at least one. For every other vector it is positive. Averaging the pointwise inequality 1Zn≥t≤ex(Zn−t)\mathbf1_{Z_n\ge t}\le e^{x(Z_n-t)} over the finite probability space gives the first inequality in (2). Independence gives

EexZn=∏i=1nEexεi/i=∏i=1nex/i+e−x/i2,\mathbb E e^{xZ_n} =\prod_{i=1}^n\mathbb E e^{x\varepsilon_i/i} =\prod_{i=1}^n\frac{e^{x/i}+e^{-x/i}}2,

which is the product in (2). This proves the exponential-moment estimate without importing a separate deviation theorem. □\square

When Hn>2H_n>2, the two tail events in (1) are disjoint. Consequently the absolute tail {∣Zn∣≥Hn−2}\{|Z_n|\ge H_n-2\} has probability 2Rn/2n2R_n/2^n, not Rn/2nR_n/2^n. The source correctly uses a lower tail and then an upper tail by symmetry.

Source. Steinerberger, arXiv:2403.17041v5, p. 2, §§2.1–2.2. This is the complete finite argument from those sections, with the relation between the two events made explicit.

Bears on. #297 only through the Theorem, whose proof uses it.