Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Statement

For sufficiently large NN, ξ∈(0,1)\xi\in(0,1), and A⊆[1,N]A\subseteq[1,N] with R(A)≥ηR(A)\ge\eta, there is A′⊆AA'\subseteq A such that

R(A′)≥(1−ξ)η,qR(Aq′)≥ηξ2log⁡log⁡N(q∈QA′).R(A')\ge(1-\xi)\eta,\qquad qR(A'_q)\ge\frac{\eta\xi}{2\log\log N}\quad(q\in\mathcal Q_{A'}).

Here Ad={n∈A:d∣n}A_d=\{n\in A:d\mid n\} and QA\mathcal Q_A is the set of prime powers dividing some element of AA.

Source. Liu–Sawhney, arXiv:2404.07113v1, Lemma 6.2, p. 19. The denominator is printed 2log⁡log⁡n2\log\log n in the statement and first proof line, with an unbound lowercase nn; the final displayed estimate uses NN, as written here.

Rewritten proof

From the current set, delete all multiples of any prime power qq whose fiber has mass less than ηξ/(2qlog⁡log⁡N)\eta\xi/(2q\log\log N). Every deletion removes at least one integer, so the process terminates. A prime power chosen once never occurs again. The total deleted mass is consequently less than

ηξ2log⁡log⁡N∑q≤N1q<ηξ\frac{\eta\xi}{2\log\log N}\sum_{q\le N}\frac1q <\eta\xi

for sufficiently large NN. In this sum qq ranges over prime powers; Mertens' estimate gives ∑q≤N1/q=log⁡log⁡N+O(1)\sum_{q\le N}1/q=\log\log N+O(1). The terminal set therefore has the required mass, and termination means every remaining fiber satisfies the desired lower bound.

Dependencies and verification

The prime-power Mertens estimate follows from the prime estimate recorded as an external input in [[unit_fractions/liu_2024_further_questions_regarding_unit_fractions/theorem_2_1|Theorem 2.1]] and the convergence of ∑p1/(p(p−1))\sum_p1/(p(p-1)). The pruning method is the same as [[unit_fractions/bloom_2021_density_conjecture_about_unit_fractions/lemma_6|Bloom's Lemma 6]]. This rewritten proof passed independent blind review on 2026-09-18, retained as the fresh main-proof review with its distinct grade; the earlier main-proof review was ruled on 2026-09-18 a coordinated compilation check, not an independent review.

Bears on