Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Let be sufficiently large, , , and . Let , and let consist of all integers in whose prime-power divisors are at most and for which , . Suppose a positive integer satisfies
and all prime-power divisors of are at most . Then there is divisible by . Here counts distinct prime factors; counts them with multiplicity, and is the largest exponent.
Source. This expands the implicit multiple-selection step in Liu–Sawhney, arXiv:2404.07113v1, Proposition 3.2, p. 12. The argument is a compilation-supplied justification of that step. The precise prime reciprocal estimate is external at Theorem 2.1.
Bears on. Problem 297, through the nonempty fibers in the counting minor-arc proof.
Proof
First find an integer coprime to and satisfying . For every positive integer , the number of its multiples in this closed real interval differs from by at most one. Inclusion–exclusion over the at most five prime divisors of therefore gives at least
integers coprime to . The product is that for the five smallest primes, and the last inequality holds for .
The identity
counts each prime-power divisor once. The prime reciprocal estimate and convergence of give an absolute constant with
Thus the number of integers at most with is at most . Uniformly for , this is , since
For large it is less than . Consequently one of the coprime integers in the interval has .
Set . Then . Coprimality prevents combining prime exponents across the two factors, so
for large . All prime-power divisors of are at most by hypothesis; those of are at most . Therefore , as required.
Scope
The restricted Proposition 3.2 constructs and verifies every hypothesis above. This lemma does not assume a prime in an interval whose lower endpoint may stay bounded.