Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


For each fixed positive rational xx, the number of subsets A⊆[n]A\subseteq[n] with ∑a∈A1/a=x\sum_{a\in A}1/a=x satisfies

Nn(x)=2cxn+ox(n),lim⁡n→∞log⁡2Nn(x)n=cx.(1)N_n(x)=2^{c_xn+o_x(n)},\qquad \lim_{n\to\infty}\frac{\log_2 N_n(x)}n=c_x. \tag{1}

Here

cx=∫01h ⁣(11+eλx/y) dy,∫01dyy(1+eλx/y)=x,λx>0.c_x=\int_0^1h\!\left(\frac1{1+e^{\lambda_x/y}}\right)\,dy, \qquad \int_0^1\frac{dy}{y(1+e^{\lambda_x/y})}=x,\quad\lambda_x>0.

The exponent is continuous and strictly increasing, tends to 0 at x↓0x\downarrow0, and tends to 1 at infinity. In particular 0<cx<10<c_x<1. The source-reported decimal c1≈0.91117c_1\approx0.91117 has not been numerically certified in this compilation. Equation (1) is an exponential-rate statement: it does not assert Nn(x)/2cxn→1N_n(x)/2^{c_xn}\to1.

Source: published PDF, Theorem 1, p. 2, with proof completed on p. 11. The ordinary proof is complete relative to the explicitly listed external estimates. This source unit does not compile the materially distinct Liu–Sawhney counting proof.

Bears on. Problem 297.

Proof

The characterization and properties of cxc_x were proved in entropy_exponent. Since Nn(x)≤Rn(x)N_n(x)\le R_n(x), the upper bound in lemma_1 and the fixed-xx limit in lemma_2 give

lim sup⁡n→∞log⁡2Nn(x)n≤cx\limsup_{n\to\infty}\frac{\log_2 N_n(x)}n\le c_x

whenever the logarithm is defined, with the same upper bound trivially true if a count is zero.

Fix any sufficiently small ε\varepsilon with 0<ε<x0<\varepsilon<x. The denominator of this fixed rational xx is n1−ε/2n^{1-\varepsilon}/2-powersmooth for large nn. Also x≤ξ(ε)log⁡nx\le\xi(\varepsilon)\log n eventually. theorem_4 therefore gives a positive count and

lim inf⁡n→∞log⁡2Nn(x)n≥cx−8ε.\liminf_{n\to\infty}\frac{\log_2 N_n(x)}n\ge c_x-8\varepsilon.

This argument holds for every sufficiently small fixed ε>0\varepsilon>0; first take the limit in nn with ε\varepsilon fixed, then let ε↓0\varepsilon\downarrow0. The upper and lower bounds prove (1). For x=1x=1, c1<1c_1<1 answers in the negative Erdős and Graham's question whether Nn(1)=2n−o(n)N_n(1)=2^{n-o(n)}, while determining the exact exponential rate. No assertion about a multiplicative error or a numerical evaluation of the defining integrals is needed.